Eck Dustin L, Perdikis Galen, Rawal Bhupendra, Bagaria Sanjay, McLaughlin Sarah A
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(10):3297-303. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3903-3. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is expected to add surgical morbidity but this incremental risk has not yet been defined. We sought to quantify the additional risks associated with CPM and determine how these risks influence the time to adjuvant therapy.
We identified women undergoing mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer and stratified them according to the use of CPM and the presence and laterality of surgical complications. We measured time to adjuvant therapy.
Of 352 patients, 205 (58 %) underwent unilateral mastectomy (UM) and 147 (42 %) underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM) [BM = UM + CPM]. Overall, 94/352 (27 %) women suffered 112 complications (BM: 46/147 [31 %] vs. UM: 48/205 [23 %]; p = 0.11), of which hematoma, skin necrosis, cellulitis, or seroma accounted for 94/112 (84 %) complications. Reoperation was required in 37/352 (10 %) women. Among those undergoing BM, morbidity occurred only in the prophylactic breast in 19/147 (13 %) women and risk did not differ with immediate reconstruction (13/108 [12 %]) or without (6/39 [15 %]). Of these 19 patients, 10 (53 %) required reoperation. Women with any complication had a longer interval to adjuvant therapy when compared with those without (49 days vs. 40 days; p < 0.001). When stratified according to side, complications in the prophylactic breast were not associated with a delay in treatment (UM: 58 days vs. BM: prophylactic side; 41 days vs. BM: cancer side: 50 days; p = 0.73).
CPM confers additional morbidity in one in eight women, of whom half require reoperation. Despite this, in our series CPM did not delay adjuvant therapy. Given the rising incidence of patients seeking CPM, they should be informed of this risk.
对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)预计会增加手术并发症,但这种额外风险尚未明确。我们试图量化与CPM相关的额外风险,并确定这些风险如何影响辅助治疗的时间。
我们确定了因单侧乳腺癌接受乳房切除术的女性,并根据是否使用CPM以及手术并发症的存在和部位进行分层。我们测量了辅助治疗的时间。
在352例患者中,205例(58%)接受了单侧乳房切除术(UM),147例(42%)接受了双侧乳房切除术(BM)[BM = UM + CPM]。总体而言,94/352例(27%)女性发生了112例并发症(BM:46/147例[31%] vs. UM:48/205例[23%];p = 0.11),其中血肿、皮肤坏死、蜂窝织炎或血清肿占94/112例(84%)并发症。37/352例(10%)女性需要再次手术。在接受BM的患者中,19/147例(13%)女性仅在预防性乳房出现并发症,且风险与即刻重建(13/108例[12%])或未进行即刻重建(6/39例[15%])无关。在这19例患者中,10例(53%)需要再次手术。与无并发症的女性相比,有任何并发症的女性辅助治疗间隔时间更长(49天 vs. 40天;p < 0.001)。按部位分层时,预防性乳房的并发症与治疗延迟无关(UM:58天 vs. BM:预防性乳房一侧;41天 vs. BM:患癌一侧:50天;p = 0.73)。
CPM使八分之一的女性出现额外并发症,其中一半需要再次手术。尽管如此,在我们的系列研究中,CPM并未延迟辅助治疗。鉴于寻求CPM的患者发病率不断上升,应告知她们这种风险。