Nakyinsige K, Fatimah A B, Aghwan Z A, Zulkifli I, Goh Y M, Sazili A Q
Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia ; Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Islamic University in Uganda, P.O. Box 2555, Mbale, Uganda .
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia .
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 Mar;27(3):406-13. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13437.
A study was conducted to compare the effect of halal slaughter without stunning and gas stun killing followed by bleeding on residual blood content and storage stability of rabbit meat. Eighty male New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups of 40 animals each and subjected to either halal slaughter without stunning (HS) or gas stun-kill (GK). The volume of blood lost during exsanguination was measured. Residual blood was further quantified by determination of haemoglobin content in Longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle. Storage stability of the meat was evaluated by microbiological analysis and measuring lipid oxidation in terms of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). HS resulted in significantly higher blood loss than GK. HS had significantly lower residual haemoglobin in LL muscle compared to GK. Slaughter method had no effect on rabbit meat lipid oxidation at 0, 1, and 3 d postmortem. However, at 5 and 8 days of storage at 4°C, significant differences (p<0.05) were found, with meat from the GK group exhibiting significantly higher levels of MDA than that from HS. At day 3, greater growth of Pseudomonas aeroginosa and E. coli were observed in the GK group (p<0.05) with B. thermosphacta and total aerobic counts remained unaffected by slaughter method. At days 5 and 7 postmortem, bacterial counts for all tested microbes were affected by slaughter method, with GK exhibiting significantly higher growth than HS. It can be concluded that slaughter method can affect keeping quality of rabbit meat, and HS may be a favourable option compared to GK due to high bleed out.
开展了一项研究,以比较不放血清真屠宰和电击致昏后放血对兔肉残留血量和储存稳定性的影响。80只雄性新西兰白兔被分为两组,每组40只,分别接受不放血清真屠宰(HS)或电击致昏(GK)。测量了放血过程中流失的血量。通过测定腰大肌(LL)中的血红蛋白含量进一步量化残留血量。通过微生物分析和以硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质(TBARS)衡量脂质氧化来评估肉的储存稳定性。HS导致的失血量显著高于GK。与GK相比,HS的LL肌肉中残留血红蛋白显著更低。屠宰方法对宰后0、1和3天的兔肉脂质氧化没有影响。然而,在4℃储存5天和8天时,发现有显著差异(p<0.05),GK组的肉中丙二醛(MDA)水平显著高于HS组。在第3天,GK组中铜绿假单胞菌和大肠杆菌的生长更多(p<0.05),热杀索丝菌和好氧菌总数不受屠宰方法影响。在宰后第5天和第7天,所有测试微生物的细菌计数都受屠宰方法影响,GK组的生长显著高于HS组。可以得出结论,屠宰方法会影响兔肉的保存质量,由于放血充分,与GK相比,HS可能是一个更好的选择。