Suppr超能文献

[比较使用大剂量丙泊酚、甲己炔巴比妥或依托咪酯作为催眠药并联合阿芬太尼镇痛的麻醉过程]

[A comparison of the course of anesthesia using a bolus application of propofol, methohexital or etomidate as hypnotics and alfentanil analgesia].

作者信息

Ensink F B, Schwabe K, Bittrich B, Kuhn U, Weingarten J, Schenk H D

机构信息

Institut für Anaesthesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende e.V.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1989 Jul;38(7):333-40.

PMID:2505630
Abstract

The suitability of the analgesic-hypnotic combination alfentanil-propofol in nitrous oxide-oxygen IPPB for short-term and outpatient anesthesia was studied in 50 patients of ASA risk groups I and II. This study appeared pertinent since the two substances have the shortest half-lives of their respective classes of medication. For comparison, two groups of similar size were treated with the well-established combinations alfentanil-methohexital and alfentanil-etomidate. During the entire intra- and postoperative periods the circulatory parameters were frequently monitored as was the continuous recording of the compressed spectral array in the EEG. Thirty minutes after extubation three modified tests of recovery were carried out that were compared to the preoperative results. For a subjective evaluation, a multiple choice questionnaire was answered by each patient after the recovery tests. The mean duration of anaesthesia in all three groups was 1 h. All three combinations were found to be agreeable to the patients with the best results in the propofol group. These patients also showed the most rapid recovery; consequently, the combination of alfentanil and propofol would appear to be especially suitable for outpatients. For the induction of anesthesia alfentanil was administered in a dosage of 30 micrograms/kg body weight in combination with propofol 1.5 mg/kg, methohexital 1.0 mg/kg or etomidate 0.2 mg/kg. For anesthesia maintenance the following mean dosages were found to be suitable: Alfentanil 1 microgram/kg/min, propofol 46 micrograms/kg/min, methohexital 24 micrograms/kg/min, and etomidate 4 micrograms/kg/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在50例ASA风险等级为I级和II级的患者中,研究了镇痛 - 催眠合剂阿芬太尼 - 丙泊酚用于氧化亚氮 - 氧气间歇正压通气(IPPB)下短期和门诊麻醉的适用性。由于这两种药物在各自类别中半衰期最短,所以该研究显得很有意义。为作比较,两组规模相似的患者分别接受成熟的合剂阿芬太尼 - 美索比妥和阿芬太尼 - 依托咪酯治疗。在整个术中和术后期间,频繁监测循环参数,并持续记录脑电图的压缩谱阵图。拔管后30分钟进行三项改良的恢复测试,并与术前结果进行比较。为进行主观评估,恢复测试后每位患者回答一份多项选择题问卷。所有三组的平均麻醉持续时间均为1小时。发现所有三种合剂患者均可接受,丙泊酚组效果最佳。这些患者恢复也最快;因此,阿芬太尼和丙泊酚的合剂似乎特别适合门诊患者。麻醉诱导时,阿芬太尼以30微克/千克体重的剂量与丙泊酚1.5毫克/千克、美索比妥1.0毫克/千克或依托咪酯0.2毫克/千克联合使用。麻醉维持时,发现以下平均剂量合适:阿芬太尼1微克/千克/分钟、丙泊酚46微克/千克/分钟、美索比妥24微克/千克/分钟和依托咪酯4微克/千克/分钟。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验