Petelin Milan, Perkič Katja, Seme Katja, Gašpirc Boris
Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Hrvatski trg 6, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia,
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(6):1647-56. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1632-2. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of subgingival ultrasonic scaling followed by repeated (three times) antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (PDT), ultrasonic scaling alone (US), and scaling and root planing with hand instruments (SRP) for initial periodontal treatment. Twenty-seven non-smoking systemically healthy chronic periodontitis patients were included. Residual pockets ≥4 mm deep and bleeding on probing were debrided either with SRP, US alone, or US followed by a single episode of PDT during supportive periodontal treatment. Probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were monitored over 12 months. The presence of five periodontal pathogens in the pockets was determined by a commercially available micro-IDent test. Intergroup and intragroup statistical analysis was performed. All three treatments resulted in a significant clinical improvement. Additional application of PDT to US failed to result in further improvement in terms of PPD reduction and CAL gain. However, it resulted in a higher reduction of BOP at 3 and 12 months comparing to US alone or SRP (PDT from 25 to 13 and to 9%, US from 23 to 16 and to 12%, and SRP from 17 to 10 and to 9%, respectively). PDT reduced the proportion of positive sites after 6 months for Treponema denticola (TD) significantly more effectively than US or SRP (p < 0.0001). Additionally, PDT resulted in a greater reduction of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (AA), Tannerella forsythia (TF), and TD in medium pockets (4-6 mm) (p < 0.02) and of TD in deep pockets (>6 mm) compared to mechanical debridement alone (p < 0.05).
本研究的目的是比较龈下超声洁治后重复(三次)抗菌光动力疗法(PDT)、单纯超声洁治(US)以及用手工器械进行龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)用于初始牙周治疗的效果。纳入了27名非吸烟的全身健康的慢性牙周炎患者。在牙周支持治疗期间,对深度≥4 mm的残余牙周袋和探诊出血部位,分别采用SRP、单纯US或US后单次PDT进行清创。在12个月内监测探诊牙周袋深度(PPD)、探诊出血(BOP)和临床附着水平(CAL)。通过市售的微鉴定试验确定牙周袋中五种牙周病原体的存在情况。进行组间和组内统计分析。所有三种治疗均导致临床显著改善。在PPD降低和CAL增加方面,US额外应用PDT未能带来进一步改善。然而,与单纯US或SRP相比,PDT在3个月和12个月时导致BOP降低幅度更大(PDT分别从25%降至13%和9%,US从23%降至16%和12%,SRP从17%降至10%和9%)。6个月后,PDT比US或SRP更有效地显著降低了具核梭杆菌(TD)的阳性部位比例(p<0.0001)。此外,与单纯机械清创相比,PDT在中等深度牙周袋(4 - 6 mm)中导致伴放线聚集杆菌(AA)、福赛坦纳菌(TF)和TD的减少幅度更大(p<0.02),在深度牙周袋(>6 mm)中导致TD的减少幅度更大(p<0.05)。