Kim Gyu Ri, Netuveli Gopalakrishnan, Blane David, Peasey Anne, Malyutina Sofia, Simonova Galina, Kubinova Ruzena, Pajak Andrzej, Croezen Simone, Bobak Martin, Pikhart Hynek
a Department of Epidemiology and Public Health , University College London , London , UK.
Aging Ment Health. 2015 Jul;19(7):595-609. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.938605. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
The aim was to assess the reliability and validity of the quality of life (QoL) instrument CASP-19, and three shorter versions of CASP-12 in large population sample of older adults from the HAPIEE (Health, Alcohol, and Psychosocial factors In Eastern Europe) study.
From the Czech Republic, Russia, and Poland, 13,210 HAPIEE participants aged 50 or older completed the retirement questionnaire including CASP-19 at baseline. Three shorter 12-item versions were also derived from original 19-item instrument. Psychometric validation used confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlation, and construct validity.
The second-order four-factor model of CASP-19 did not provide a good fit to the data. Two-factor CASP-12v.3 including residual covariances for negative items to account for the method effect of negative items had the best fit to the data in all countries (CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.05, and WRMR = 1.65 in the Czech Republic; 0.96, 0.94, 0.07, and 2.70 in Poland; and 0.93, 0.90, 0.08, and 3.04 in Russia). Goodness-of-fit indices for the two-factor structure were substantially better than second-order models.
This large population-based study is the first validation study of CASP scale in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), which includes a general population sample in Russia, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The results of this study have demonstrated that the CASP-12v.3 is a valid and reliable tool for assessing QoL among adults aged 50 years or older. This version of CASP is recommended for use in future studies investigating QoL in the CEE populations.
旨在评估生活质量(QoL)工具CASP - 19以及三个较短版本的CASP - 12在来自HAPIEE(东欧健康、酒精及社会心理因素)研究的老年人群大样本中的信度和效度。
来自捷克共和国、俄罗斯和波兰的13210名年龄在50岁及以上的HAPIEE参与者在基线时完成了包括CASP - 19在内的退休问卷。三个较短的12项版本也源自原始的19项工具。心理测量学验证采用验证性因素分析、克朗巴哈系数、皮尔逊相关性和结构效度。
CASP - 19的二阶四因素模型与数据拟合不佳。包含负项残差协方差以解释负项方法效应的双因素CASP - 12v.3在所有国家与数据拟合最佳(在捷克共和国,CFI = 0.98,TLI = 0.97,RMSEA = 0.05,WRMR = 1.65;在波兰,CFI = 0.96,TLI = 0.94,RMSEA = 0.07,WRMR = 2.70;在俄罗斯,CFI = 0.93,TLI = 0.90,RMSEA = 0.08,WRMR = 3.04)。双因素结构的拟合优度指标明显优于二阶模型。
这项基于人群的大型研究是中东欧(CEE)地区首次对CASP量表进行的验证研究,该研究纳入了俄罗斯、波兰和捷克共和国的普通人群样本。本研究结果表明,CASP - 12v.3是评估50岁及以上成年人生活质量的有效且可靠的工具。建议在未来研究中东欧人群生活质量时使用此版本的CASP。