Baschiera Fabio, Chang William, Brunel Patrick
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Jun 25;10:389-97. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S63725. eCollection 2014.
Systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension in elderly patients. There is increasing evidence that measurement of central aortic pressure (CAP) better accounts for cardiovascular risk than brachial blood pressure (BP). The Aliskiren for GEriatric LowEring of SyStolic hypertension (AGELESS) study in elderly patients with systolic hypertension showed that aliskiren-based therapy provided greater reductions in peripheral BP than ramipril-based therapy over 12 and 36 weeks of treatment. Here, we present CAP results in a substudy of elderly patients from the AGELESS study.
This was a post hoc analysis of a 36-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, optional-titration study in patients ≥65 years of age with systolic BP ≥140 mmHg. Changes in both central and peripheral BP and pulse pressure (PP) and changes in systolic and PP amplification ratios from baseline to the week 36 end point with aliskiren-based versus ramipril-based therapy were analyzed.
Of the 901 patients randomized in the overall study, 154 patients (aliskiren, n=78; ramipril, n=76) had CAP data. Numerically comparable reductions were seen for central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) in aliskiren-based therapy (baseline: 143.7±15.0; week 36: -20.3±16.2) compared with ramipril-based therapy (baseline: 147.9±11.9; week 36: -20.7±14.6). However, for the change in central aortic diastolic pressure, the least squares mean between-treatment difference (-3.6 mmHg [95% confidence interval, -6.76, -0.43; P=0.0263]) was in favor of aliskiren, while the other changes were comparable between the two groups with a trend in favor of aliskiren for CASP as well (-2.6 mmHg [95% confidence interval, -7.38, 2.19; P=0.2855)]. Correlation coefficients for change from baseline between CASP and systolic BP and between central aortic pulse pressure and PP (r=0.8, P<0.0001) were highly significant.
Aliskiren-based therapy provides comparable reductions in CASP to ramipril-based therapy. Although the results did not reach statistical significance, these findings, when coupled with those of the main study, suggest that aliskiren may offer effective control of central BP in elderly patients with systolic hypertension and may be a good alternative to ramipril.
收缩期高血压是老年患者中最常见的高血压类型。越来越多的证据表明,与肱动脉血压(BP)相比,中心主动脉压(CAP)的测量能更好地反映心血管风险。老年收缩期高血压患者的阿利吉仑降低收缩压研究(AGELESS)显示,在12周和36周的治疗中,基于阿利吉仑的治疗比基于雷米普利的治疗能使外周血压有更大幅度的降低。在此,我们展示来自AGELESS研究的老年患者亚组研究中的CAP结果。
这是一项对年龄≥65岁、收缩压≥140 mmHg的患者进行的为期36周的随机、双盲、平行组、活性药物对照、可选择滴定的研究的事后分析。分析了基于阿利吉仑与基于雷米普利的治疗从基线到第36周终点时中心和外周血压及脉压(PP)的变化以及收缩压和PP放大率的变化。
在整个研究中随机分组的901例患者中,154例患者(阿利吉仑组,n = 78;雷米普利组,n = 76)有CAP数据。与基于雷米普利的治疗相比(基线:147.9±11.9;第36周:-20.7±14.6),基于阿利吉仑的治疗在中心主动脉收缩压(CASP)方面有数值上相当的降低(基线:143.7±15.0;第36周:-20.3±16.2)。然而,对于中心主动脉舒张压的变化,组间最小二乘均值差异(-3.6 mmHg [95%置信区间,-6.76,-0.43;P = 0.0263])有利于阿利吉仑,而两组间的其他变化相当,CASP也有有利于阿利吉仑的趋势(-2.6 mmHg [95%置信区间,-7.38,2.19;P = 0.2855])。CASP与收缩压之间以及中心主动脉脉压与PP之间从基线开始变化的相关系数(r = 0.8,P < 0.0001)非常显著。
基于阿利吉仑的治疗与基于雷米普利的治疗在降低CASP方面效果相当。尽管结果未达到统计学显著性,但这些发现与主要研究的结果相结合表明,阿利吉仑可能有效控制老年收缩期高血压患者的中心血压,并且可能是雷米普利的一个良好替代药物。