Clendenen Steven, Greengrass Roy, Whalen Joseph, O'Connor Mary I
Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road South, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3812-6.
Current opinion suggests that in some patients, chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a neuropathic origin. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPSN) has been implicated as a cause of medial knee pain; however, local treatments for this condition remain controversial.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to explore the efficacy of local treatment to the IPSN in patients with persistent medial knee pain after TKA.
In this retrospective series, 16 consecutive patients with persistent medial knee pain after primary or revision TKA were identified after other potential etiologies of knee pain were excluded. Using advanced ultrasound imaging to identify the IPSN, hydrodissection of the nerve from the adjacent interfascial planes was performed followed by corticosteroid injection (local treatment). In two patients, radiofrequency ablation of the IPSN was subsequently performed for recurrent symptoms. The outcome measure of this study was patient-reported relief of medial knee pain based on a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 0 to 10 either at rest or with activity, whichever resulted in more pain for the patient. Followup was at a minimum of 6 months (median, 9 months; range, 6-12 months). Before the procedure, the median highest VAS pain score, either at rest or with activity, was 8 of 10 (range, 6-10).
Local injections to the infrapatellar saphenous nerve (one or two injections) improved medial pain after TKA to a VAS score of 0 or 1 in nine of our 16 patients. Three patients reported pain improvement to VAS levels of 3 to 4. Of the remaining four patients, two did not have improvement with VAS scores of 8, and two underwent subsequent radiofrequency ablation of the IPSN with resolution of pain in one patient.
In summary, we believe injury to the IPSN may be an underappreciated cause of persistent medial pain after TKA. We report favorable preliminary results with local treatment to the nerve in nine of our 16 patients, suggesting that the neuritis is a reversible process in some patients; however, because of the possibility of a placebo effect, we believe this treatment modality should be tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
目前观点认为,在一些患者中,全膝关节置换术(TKA)后慢性疼痛源于神经病变。隐神经髌下支(IPSN)损伤被认为是膝关节内侧疼痛的一个原因;然而,针对这种情况的局部治疗仍存在争议。
问题/目的:我们试图探讨TKA后持续膝关节内侧疼痛患者局部治疗IPSN的疗效。
在这个回顾性系列研究中,在排除膝关节疼痛的其他潜在病因后,确定了16例初次或翻修TKA后持续膝关节内侧疼痛的连续患者。使用先进的超声成像识别IPSN,从相邻筋膜平面进行神经水分离,随后注射皮质类固醇(局部治疗)。在两名患者中,随后对IPSN进行射频消融以治疗复发症状。本研究的结果指标是患者报告的基于0至10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的膝关节内侧疼痛缓解情况,以休息或活动时疼痛较重者为准。随访至少6个月(中位数9个月;范围6 - 12个月)。术前,休息或活动时VAS疼痛评分中位数最高为10分中的8分(范围6 - 10分)。
对髌下隐神经进行局部注射(一次或两次)后,我们16例患者中有9例TKA后的内侧疼痛改善至VAS评分为0或1。3例患者报告疼痛改善至VAS评分为3至4。其余4例患者中,2例VAS评分为8分未改善,2例随后接受了IPSN射频消融,其中1例疼痛缓解。
总之,我们认为IPSN损伤可能是TKA后持续内侧疼痛的一个未被充分认识的原因。我们报告了16例患者中有9例对神经进行局部治疗的良好初步结果,表明神经炎在一些患者中是一个可逆过程;然而,由于存在安慰剂效应的可能性,我们认为这种治疗方式应在随机、安慰剂对照试验中进行测试。
IV级,治疗性研究。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。