Andrade J M, Estévez-Pérez M G
Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of A Coruña, Campus da Zapateira, E-15008 A Coruña, Spain.
Department of Estadística e Investigación Operativa, University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña, E-15008 A Coruña, Spain.
Anal Chim Acta. 2014 Aug 1;838:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.057. Epub 2014 May 2.
Comparing the slopes of two regression lines is an almost daily task in analytical laboratories. The usual procedure is based on a Student's t-test although literature differs in whether the standard errors of the slopes or the standard errors of the regressions should be employed to get a pooled standard error. In this work fundamental concepts on the use of the Student's test were reviewed and Monte Carlo simulations were done to ascertain whether relevant differences arise when the two options are considered. It was concluded that for small sample sets (as it is usual in analytical laboratories) the Student's t-test based on the standard error of regression models must be used and special attention must be paid on the equality of the models variances. Finally, alternative approaches were reviewed, with emphasis on a simple one based on the analysis of the covariance (ANCOVA).
在分析实验室中,比较两条回归线的斜率几乎是一项日常任务。通常的程序基于学生t检验,尽管文献对于是应使用斜率的标准误差还是回归的标准误差来获得合并标准误差存在差异。在这项工作中,回顾了使用学生检验的基本概念,并进行了蒙特卡洛模拟,以确定在考虑这两种选择时是否会出现相关差异。得出的结论是,对于小样本集(分析实验室中常见),必须使用基于回归模型标准误差的学生t检验,并且必须特别注意模型方差的相等性。最后,回顾了替代方法,重点是基于协方差分析(ANCOVA)的一种简单方法。