Sagliano Laura, Trojano Luigi, Amoriello Katja, Migliozzi Michela, D'Olimpio Francesca
Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples Caserta, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 1;5:685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00685. eCollection 2014.
Attentional biases toward threats (ABTs) have been described in high anxious individuals and in clinical samples whereas they have been rarely reported in non-clinical samples (Bar-Haim et al., 2007; Cisler and Koster, 2010). Three kinds of ABTs have been identified (facilitation, difficulty of disengagement, and avoidance) but their mechanisms and time courses are still unclear. This study aimed to understand ABTs mechanisms and timing in low trait anxiety (LTA) and high trait anxiety (HTA) anxious individuals. In particular, in an exogenous cueing task we used threatening or neutral stimuli as peripheral cues with three presentation times (100, 200, or 500 ms). The main results showed that HTA individuals have an attentional facilitation bias at 100 ms (likely automatic in nature) whereas LTA individuals show attentional avoidance and difficulty to disengage from threatening stimuli at 200 ms (likely related to a strategic processing). Such findings demonstrate that threat biases attention with specific mechanisms and time courses, and that anxiety levels modulate attention allocation.
对威胁的注意偏向(ABTs)在高焦虑个体和临床样本中已有描述,而在非临床样本中却鲜有报道(Bar-Haim等人,2007年;Cisler和Koster,2010年)。已识别出三种ABTs(促进、脱离困难和回避),但其机制和时间进程仍不清楚。本研究旨在了解低特质焦虑(LTA)和高特质焦虑(HTA)个体中ABTs的机制和时间。特别是,在一项外源性线索任务中,我们使用威胁性或中性刺激作为外周线索,设置了三种呈现时间(100、200或500毫秒)。主要结果表明,HTA个体在100毫秒时存在注意促进偏向(可能本质上是自动的),而LTA个体在200毫秒时表现出注意回避以及难以从威胁性刺激中脱离(可能与策略性加工有关)。这些发现表明,威胁通过特定的机制和时间进程影响注意,并且焦虑水平调节注意分配。