Bondarenko Alexander I
Circulatory Physiology Department, O.O.Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kiev, Ukraine; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Br J Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;171(24):5573-88. doi: 10.1111/bph.12866.
Cannabinoids and their synthetic analogues affect a broad range of physiological functions, including cardiovascular variables. Although direct evidence is still missing, the relaxation of a vast range of vascular beds induced by cannabinoids is believed to involve a still unidentified non-CB1 , non-CB2 Gi/o protein-coupled receptor located on endothelial cells, the so called endothelial cannabinoid receptor (eCB receptor). Evidence for the presence of an eCB receptor comes mainly from vascular relaxation studies, which commonly employ pertussis toxin as an indicator for GPCR-mediated signalling. In addition, a pharmacological approach is widely used to attribute the relaxation to eCB receptors. Recent findings have indicated a number of GPCR-independent targets for both agonists and antagonists of the presumed eCB receptor, warranting further investigations and cautious interpretation of the vascular relaxation studies. This review will provide a brief historical overview on the proposed novel eCB receptor, drawing attention to the discrepancies between the studies on the pharmacological profile of the eCB receptor and highlighting the Gi/o protein-independent actions of the eCB receptor inhibitors widely used as selective compounds. As the eCB receptor represents an attractive pharmacological target for a number of cardiovascular abnormalities, defining its molecular identity and the extent of its regulation of vascular function will have important implications for drug discovery. This review highlights the need to re-evaluate this subject in a thoughtful and rigorous fashion. More studies are needed to differentiate Gi/o protein-dependent endothelial cannabinoid signalling from that involving the classical CB1 and CB2 receptors as well as its relevance for pathophysiological conditions.
大麻素及其合成类似物会影响广泛的生理功能,包括心血管变量。尽管仍缺乏直接证据,但据信大麻素诱导的多种血管床舒张涉及一种位于内皮细胞上的尚未明确的非CB1、非CB2 Gi/o蛋白偶联受体,即所谓的内皮大麻素受体(eCB受体)。eCB受体存在的证据主要来自血管舒张研究,这些研究通常使用百日咳毒素作为GPCR介导信号传导的指标。此外,药理学方法被广泛用于将舒张作用归因于eCB受体。最近的研究结果表明,推测的eCB受体的激动剂和拮抗剂存在许多不依赖GPCR的靶点,这就需要进一步研究并谨慎解读血管舒张研究。本综述将简要介绍关于新提出的eCB受体的历史概况,提请注意eCB受体药理学特征研究之间的差异,并强调广泛用作选择性化合物的eCB受体抑制剂的不依赖Gi/o蛋白的作用。由于eCB受体是许多心血管异常的有吸引力的药理学靶点,确定其分子身份及其对血管功能的调节程度将对药物发现具有重要意义。本综述强调需要以深思熟虑和严谨的方式重新评估这个问题。需要更多的研究来区分依赖Gi/o蛋白的内皮大麻素信号传导与涉及经典CB1和CB2受体的信号传导及其与病理生理状况的相关性。