Antonelli Carlo, Luchetti Marco, De Trana Luigi
a S. Giovanni di Dio General Hospital , Melfi , Italy.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2014;62(4):483-91. doi: 10.1080/00207144.2014.931178.
A male patient needed surgery for the ablation of 4 impacted maxillary molars that prevented chewing and had contributed to progressively worsening trigeminal neuralgia. Two previous anesthetic procedures led to episodes of severe anaphylactic shock with the need for a prolonged stay in the ICU. Hypnotic anesthesia was therefore selected as a safer option for this patient. After 4 preparative sessions, on the day of surgery, the hypnotist provided an induction followed by suggestions for mouth and face anesthesia. Intubation occurred following the introduction of remifentanil and sevoflurane. The surgery lasted about 90 minutes and proceeded uneventfully. This case report describes how conventional and hypnotic anesthesia may work synergistically and may be particularly advantageous in case of drug allergy.
一名男性患者需要进行手术,切除4颗阻生上颌磨牙,这些牙齿妨碍咀嚼,并导致三叉神经痛逐渐加重。此前的两次麻醉过程引发了严重的过敏性休克,患者需要在重症监护病房长时间住院。因此,催眠麻醉被选为该患者更安全的选择。经过4次准备疗程后,在手术当天,催眠师进行了诱导,随后给出了口腔和面部麻醉的建议。在使用瑞芬太尼和七氟醚后进行了插管。手术持续了约90分钟,过程顺利。本病例报告描述了传统麻醉和催眠麻醉如何协同发挥作用,以及在药物过敏情况下可能具有的特别优势。