Suppr超能文献

早期肺癌楔形切除术与立体定向体部放疗的倾向评分匹配分析。

A propensity-matched analysis of wedge resection and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage lung cancer.

作者信息

Port Jeffrey L, Parashar Bhupesh, Osakwe Nonso, Nasar Abu, Lee Paul C, Paul Subroto, Stiles Brendon M, Altorki Nasser K

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.

Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.128. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who present with early stage non-small cell lung cancer and are poor candidates for lobar resection may be offered sublobar resection (commonly wedge) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, comparing the relative effectiveness of these techniques is difficult because of differences in patient selection. We performed a propensity-matched analysis to compare the different treatment modalities. We compared the overall recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival between treatment groups.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database was reviewed for patients who underwent a wedge resection, a wedge plus brachytherapy, or SBRT for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer from 2001 to 2012. Patients who underwent SBRT were further assessed to confirm operability. Univariate and Cox regression multivariate analysis were performed for predictors of a composite end point of recurrence and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 164 patients identified, from which 99 were matched by age, sex, and histology. There were 61 women (62%) and 38 men (38%) with a median age of 73 years. Thirty-eight patients underwent a wedge resection only, 38 patients underwent a wedge with brachytherapy, and 23 patients had SBRT. Median follow-up was 35 months. Overall recurrence (local and distant) was significantly higher after SBRT (wedge, 9%; SBRT, 30%; p = 0.016). Although recurrence-free 3 -year survival was significantly better after wedge resection (88% versus 72%; p = 0.001), there was no difference between the two groups in disease-free 3-year survival (77% versus 59%; p = 0.066). Multivariate regression analysis identified male sex and SBRT as significant predictors for mortality and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer treated by SBRT appear to have higher overall disease recurrence than those treated by wedge resection. However, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival. A randomized trial is needed to define the role of SBRT in the potentially operable patient.

摘要

背景

对于早期非小细胞肺癌患者且不适合进行肺叶切除的患者,可考虑进行亚肺叶切除(通常为楔形切除)或立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)。然而,由于患者选择的差异,比较这些技术的相对有效性较为困难。我们进行了倾向匹配分析以比较不同的治疗方式。我们比较了治疗组之间的总体复发率、总生存率、无病生存率和无复发生存率。

方法

回顾了一个前瞻性收集的数据库,纳入2001年至2012年因临床IA期非小细胞肺癌接受楔形切除、楔形切除加近距离放疗或SBRT的患者。对接受SBRT的患者进一步评估以确认可手术性。对复发和死亡复合终点的预测因素进行单因素和Cox回归多因素分析。

结果

共确定164例患者,其中99例按年龄、性别和组织学进行匹配。有61名女性(62%)和38名男性(38%),中位年龄为73岁。38例患者仅接受楔形切除,38例患者接受楔形切除加近距离放疗,23例患者接受SBRT。中位随访时间为35个月。SBRT后的总体复发(局部和远处)明显更高(楔形切除,9%;SBRT,30%;p = 0.016)。虽然楔形切除后3年无复发生存率明显更好(88%对72%;p = 0.001),但两组在3年无病生存率方面无差异(77%对59%;p = 0.066)。多因素回归分析确定男性性别和SBRT是死亡率和复发的重要预测因素。

结论

接受SBRT治疗的临床IA期非小细胞肺癌患者似乎比接受楔形切除的患者总体疾病复发率更高。然而,无病生存率无显著差异。需要进行一项随机试验来确定SBRT在潜在可手术患者中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验