Workplace Health Saf. 2014 Aug;62(8):318-24. doi: 10.1177/216507991406200802. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
The cost of employee absenteeism in the United States is significant in terms of sick pay, overtime costs, replacement personnel compensation, and lost productivity. Little is known about what workers consider when deciding to use sick time. Previous studies have examined work absence from an array of perspectives, including resulting work strain, job satisfaction, and job security, but absenteeism in the workplace has not been examined in terms of decision making. To scrutinize workers' decisions about using sick time, a descriptive pilot study was undertaken with a convenience sample (n = 94) of working college students. The responses to the survey revealed that the majority of the workers (73.4%) used sick time because they were too ill to work. These results are in direct opposition to previous research and suggest that workers may need education about preventing and managing minor illnesses before an absence is needed. Supporting and engaging employees and their significant others in healthy worker programs, regular surveillance examinations, and illness prevention strategies are wise investments in companies' financial futures. Future research should include a comparative study of worker absenteeism between worksites with occupational health nurses and those without nurses.
美国员工缺勤的成本在病假工资、加班成本、替代人员补偿和生产力损失方面都很高。关于员工在决定使用病假时的考虑因素,人们知之甚少。之前的研究从一系列角度考察了工作缺勤,包括由此产生的工作压力、工作满意度和工作保障,但工作场所的缺勤并没有从决策的角度进行考察。为了仔细审查员工使用病假的决定,对 94 名工作的大学生进行了一项描述性的初步研究。调查的回应显示,大多数工人(73.4%)使用病假是因为他们病得太重不能工作。这些结果与之前的研究直接相悖,表明在需要缺勤之前,工人可能需要接受关于预防和管理轻微疾病的教育。支持和吸引员工及其重要他人参与健康工人计划、定期监测检查和疾病预防策略是对公司未来财务的明智投资。未来的研究应该包括对有职业健康护士的工作场所和没有护士的工作场所之间的工人缺勤情况进行比较研究。