Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Singapore Eye Research Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Aug 7;55(9):5476-81. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14940.
To investigate the impact of ambient room lighting on the magnitude of flicker light-induced retinal vasodilations in healthy individuals.
Twenty healthy nonsmokers participated in a balanced 2 × 2 crossover study. Retinal vascular imaging was performed with the dynamic vessel analyzer under reduced or normal ambient lighting, then again after 20 minutes under the alternate condition. Baseline calibers of selected arteriole and venule segments were recorded in measurement units. Maximum percentage dilations from baseline during 20 seconds of luminance flicker were calculated from the mean of three measurement cycles. Within-subject differences were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance with the assumption of no carryover effects and pairwise comparisons from the fitted model.
Mean (SD) maximum arteriole dilations during flicker stimulation under reduced and normal ambient lighting were 4.8% (2.3%) and 4.1% (1.9%), respectively (P = 0.019). Maximum arteriole dilations were (mean ± 95% confidence interval) 0.7% ± 0.6% lower under normal ambient lighting compared with reduced lighting. Ambient lighting had no significant effect on maximum venular dilations during flicker stimulation or on the baseline calibers of arterioles or venules.
Retinal arteriole dilation in response to luminance flicker stimulation is reduced under higher ambient lighting conditions. Reduced responses with higher ambient lighting may reflect reduced contrast between the ON and OFF flicker phases. Although it may not always be feasible to conduct studies under reduced lighting conditions, ambient lighting levels should be consistent to ensure that comparisons are valid.
研究环境室内照明对健康个体中闪烁光诱导的视网膜血管扩张程度的影响。
20 名健康不吸烟者参与了一项平衡的 2×2 交叉研究。在低环境照明或正常环境照明下,使用动态血管分析仪进行视网膜血管成像,然后在 20 分钟后在交替条件下再次进行。以测量单位记录选定的动脉和静脉段的基线口径。从三个测量周期的平均值计算 20 秒亮度闪烁期间从基线的最大百分比扩张。通过重复测量方差分析评估个体内差异,假设没有交叉效应,并从拟合模型进行两两比较。
在低环境照明和正常环境照明下闪烁刺激期间的平均(SD)最大动脉扩张分别为 4.8%(2.3%)和 4.1%(1.9%)(P=0.019)。与低环境照明相比,正常环境照明下最大动脉扩张低 0.7%(95%置信区间为 0.6%±0.6%)。环境照明对闪烁刺激期间最大静脉扩张或动脉和静脉的基线口径没有显著影响。
在较高环境照明条件下,对亮度闪烁刺激的视网膜动脉扩张减少。较高环境照明下的反应降低可能反映了 ON 和 OFF 闪烁阶段之间的对比度降低。尽管在低环境照明条件下进行研究并不总是可行,但应保持环境照明水平一致,以确保比较有效。