Ledder Ruth G, Latimer Joe, Humphreys Gavin J, Sreenivasan Prem K, McBain Andrew J
Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6490-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02315-14. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
Compounds of natural origin are increasingly used as adjuncts to oral hygiene. We have adopted four distinct approaches to assess the antibacterial activity of dentifrices containing natural active ingredients against oral bacteria in several test systems. Corsodyl Daily (CD), Kingfisher Mint (KM), and Parodontax fluoride (PF) were compared to a dentifrice containing fluoride (Colgate Cavity Protection [CCP]) and one containing triclosan (Colgate Total [CT]). The growth inhibitory and bactericidal potency of the formulations were determined for 10 isolated oral bacteria. Effects of single exposures of simulated supragingival plaques were then determined by epifluorescence and confocal microscopy, while the effects of repeated exposures were quantified by viable counting. Additionally, dense plaques, maintained in continuous culture, were repeatedly dosed, and the outcome was assessed by viable counting and eubacterial DNA profiling. The test dentifrices exhibited variable specificity and potency against oral bacteria in axenic culture. Of the herbal formulations, KM caused the largest viability reductions in simulated supragingival plaques, with CT causing the greatest reductions overall. Following single exposures, CD caused moderate reductions, while PF had no effect. After multiple dosing, all formulations significantly reduced numbers of total, facultative, and Gram-negative anaerobes, but only KM and CT caused greater reductions than the fluoride control. KM also reduced counts of streptococci (rank order of effectiveness: CT > KM > CCP > PF > CD). Marked changes in eubacterial DNA profiles were not detected for any herbal formulation in dense plaques, although KM markedly reduced viable counts of streptococci, in agreement with supragingival data. While both nonherbal comparators displayed antibacterial activity, the triclosan-containing formulation caused greater viability reductions than the herbal and nonherbal formulations.
天然来源的化合物越来越多地被用作口腔卫生的辅助剂。我们采用了四种不同的方法,在几个测试系统中评估含有天然活性成分的牙膏对口腔细菌的抗菌活性。将高露洁全效护理牙膏(Corsodyl Daily,CD)、翠鸟薄荷牙膏(Kingfisher Mint,KM)和含氟的专业防蛀牙膏(Parodontax fluoride,PF)与含氟牙膏(高露洁防蛀牙膏[Colgate Cavity Protection,CCP])和含三氯生牙膏(高露洁全效牙膏[Colgate Total,CT])进行比较。测定了这几种配方对10种分离出的口腔细菌的生长抑制和杀菌效力。然后通过落射荧光显微镜和共聚焦显微镜测定模拟龈上菌斑单次暴露的效果,同时通过活菌计数对重复暴露的效果进行量化。此外,对连续培养的致密菌斑反复给药,并通过活菌计数和真细菌DNA谱分析评估结果。测试牙膏在纯培养中对口腔细菌表现出不同的特异性和效力。在草药配方牙膏中,KM在模拟龈上菌斑中导致的活力降低最大,而CT总体上导致的降低最大。单次暴露后,CD导致适度降低,而PF没有效果。多次给药后,所有配方都显著减少了总需氧菌、兼性厌氧菌和革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的数量,但只有KM和CT导致的减少比含氟对照更大。KM还减少了链球菌数量(效力排名顺序:CT>KM>CCP>PF>CD)。在致密菌斑中,未检测到任何草药配方的真细菌DNA谱有明显变化,尽管KM显著降低了链球菌的活菌计数,这与龈上数据一致。虽然两种非草药对照都显示出抗菌活性,但含三氯生的配方比草药和非草药配方导致更大的活力降低。