Suppr超能文献

含天然活性成分和不含天然活性成分的牙膏的细菌学效应。

Bacteriological effects of dentifrices with and without active ingredients of natural origin.

作者信息

Ledder Ruth G, Latimer Joe, Humphreys Gavin J, Sreenivasan Prem K, McBain Andrew J

机构信息

Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Manchester Pharmacy School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6490-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02315-14. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

Abstract

Compounds of natural origin are increasingly used as adjuncts to oral hygiene. We have adopted four distinct approaches to assess the antibacterial activity of dentifrices containing natural active ingredients against oral bacteria in several test systems. Corsodyl Daily (CD), Kingfisher Mint (KM), and Parodontax fluoride (PF) were compared to a dentifrice containing fluoride (Colgate Cavity Protection [CCP]) and one containing triclosan (Colgate Total [CT]). The growth inhibitory and bactericidal potency of the formulations were determined for 10 isolated oral bacteria. Effects of single exposures of simulated supragingival plaques were then determined by epifluorescence and confocal microscopy, while the effects of repeated exposures were quantified by viable counting. Additionally, dense plaques, maintained in continuous culture, were repeatedly dosed, and the outcome was assessed by viable counting and eubacterial DNA profiling. The test dentifrices exhibited variable specificity and potency against oral bacteria in axenic culture. Of the herbal formulations, KM caused the largest viability reductions in simulated supragingival plaques, with CT causing the greatest reductions overall. Following single exposures, CD caused moderate reductions, while PF had no effect. After multiple dosing, all formulations significantly reduced numbers of total, facultative, and Gram-negative anaerobes, but only KM and CT caused greater reductions than the fluoride control. KM also reduced counts of streptococci (rank order of effectiveness: CT > KM > CCP > PF > CD). Marked changes in eubacterial DNA profiles were not detected for any herbal formulation in dense plaques, although KM markedly reduced viable counts of streptococci, in agreement with supragingival data. While both nonherbal comparators displayed antibacterial activity, the triclosan-containing formulation caused greater viability reductions than the herbal and nonherbal formulations.

摘要

天然来源的化合物越来越多地被用作口腔卫生的辅助剂。我们采用了四种不同的方法,在几个测试系统中评估含有天然活性成分的牙膏对口腔细菌的抗菌活性。将高露洁全效护理牙膏(Corsodyl Daily,CD)、翠鸟薄荷牙膏(Kingfisher Mint,KM)和含氟的专业防蛀牙膏(Parodontax fluoride,PF)与含氟牙膏(高露洁防蛀牙膏[Colgate Cavity Protection,CCP])和含三氯生牙膏(高露洁全效牙膏[Colgate Total,CT])进行比较。测定了这几种配方对10种分离出的口腔细菌的生长抑制和杀菌效力。然后通过落射荧光显微镜和共聚焦显微镜测定模拟龈上菌斑单次暴露的效果,同时通过活菌计数对重复暴露的效果进行量化。此外,对连续培养的致密菌斑反复给药,并通过活菌计数和真细菌DNA谱分析评估结果。测试牙膏在纯培养中对口腔细菌表现出不同的特异性和效力。在草药配方牙膏中,KM在模拟龈上菌斑中导致的活力降低最大,而CT总体上导致的降低最大。单次暴露后,CD导致适度降低,而PF没有效果。多次给药后,所有配方都显著减少了总需氧菌、兼性厌氧菌和革兰氏阴性厌氧菌的数量,但只有KM和CT导致的减少比含氟对照更大。KM还减少了链球菌数量(效力排名顺序:CT>KM>CCP>PF>CD)。在致密菌斑中,未检测到任何草药配方的真细菌DNA谱有明显变化,尽管KM显著降低了链球菌的活菌计数,这与龈上数据一致。虽然两种非草药对照都显示出抗菌活性,但含三氯生的配方比草药和非草药配方导致更大的活力降低。

相似文献

1
Bacteriological effects of dentifrices with and without active ingredients of natural origin.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6490-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02315-14. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
3
An in vitro comparison of dentifrice formulations in three distinct oral microbiotas.
Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Feb;57(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
4
Evaluation of the specificity and effectiveness of selected oral hygiene actives in salivary biofilm microcosms.
J Med Microbiol. 2010 Dec;59(Pt 12):1462-1468. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.024372-0. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
5
The antimicrobial efficacy of commercial dentifrices.
Gen Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;58(1):50-5; quiz 56-7, 79-80.

引用本文的文献

3
Effect of herbal and nonherbal dentifrice on gingival health - A clinical study.
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S207-S211. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_177_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
5
Influence of brushing with natural dentifrices on color change: In vitro study.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e809-e816. doi: 10.4317/jced.58066. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
A randomized triple-blind crossover trial of a hydrocolloid-containing dentifrice as a controlled-release system for fluoride.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Dec;22(9):3071-3077. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2395-0. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of oral biofilms grown in vitro.
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1876-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Analysis of artifacts suggests DGGE should not be used for quantitative diversity analysis.
J Microbiol Methods. 2013 Mar;92(3):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.12.021. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
3
Whole mouth antimicrobial effects after oral hygiene: comparison of three dentifrice formulations.
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Nov;39(11):1056-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01938.x. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
4
Antimicrobial activity of commercially available essential oils against Streptococcus mutans.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jan 1;13(1):71-4. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1098.
5
Applications of the phytomedicine Echinacea purpurea (Purple Coneflower) in infectious diseases.
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:769896. doi: 10.1155/2012/769896. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
6
Development of non-natural flavanones as antimicrobial agents.
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025681. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
8
An in vitro comparison of dentifrice formulations in three distinct oral microbiotas.
Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Feb;57(2):139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Natural products in caries research: current (limited) knowledge, challenges and future perspective.
Caries Res. 2011;45(3):243-63. doi: 10.1159/000327250. Epub 2011 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验