Tumlinson Katherine, Thomas James C, Reynolds Heidi W
a Department of Epidemiology , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.
AIDS Care. 2015;27(1):112-22. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.947236. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
In recent years, efforts to reduce HIV transmission have begun to incorporate a structural interventions approach, whereby the social, political, and economic environment in which people live is considered an important determinant of individual behaviors. This approach to HIV prevention is reflected in the growing number of programs designed to address insecure or nonexistent property rights for women living in developing countries. Qualitative and anecdotal evidence suggests that property ownership may allow women to mitigate social, economic, and biological effects of HIV for themselves and others through increased food security and income generation. Even so, the relationship between women's property and inheritance rights (WPIR) and HIV transmission behaviors is not well understood. We explored sources of data that could be used to establish quantitative links between WPIR and HIV. Our search for quantitative evidence included (1) a review of peer-reviewed and "gray" literature reporting on quantitative associations between WPIR and HIV, (2) identification and assessment of existing data-sets for their utility in exploring this relationship, and (3) interviews with organizations addressing women's property rights in Kenya and Uganda about the data they collect. We found no quantitative studies linking insecure WPIR to HIV transmission behaviors. Data-sets with relevant variables were scarce, and those with both WPIR and HIV variables could only provide superficial evidence of associations. Organizations addressing WPIR in Kenya and Uganda did not collect data that could shed light on the connection between WPIR and HIV, but the two had data and community networks that could provide a good foundation for a future study that would include the collection of additional information. Collaboration between groups addressing WPIR and HIV transmission could provide the quantitative evidence needed to determine whether and how a WPIR structural intervention could decrease HIV transmission.
近年来,减少艾滋病毒传播的努力已开始纳入一种结构性干预方法,即把人们生活的社会、政治和经济环境视为个人行为的一个重要决定因素。这种预防艾滋病毒的方法体现在越来越多旨在解决发展中国家妇女财产权不安全或不存在问题的项目中。定性和传闻证据表明,财产所有权可能使妇女能够通过增强粮食安全和创收来减轻艾滋病毒对自身及他人的社会、经济和生物学影响。即便如此,妇女财产和继承权(WPIR)与艾滋病毒传播行为之间的关系仍未得到充分理解。我们探索了可用于建立WPIR与艾滋病毒之间定量联系的数据来源。我们对定量证据的搜索包括:(1)回顾同行评审和“灰色”文献中关于WPIR与艾滋病毒之间定量关联的报道;(2)识别和评估现有数据集在探索这种关系方面的效用;(3)采访肯尼亚和乌干达处理妇女财产权问题的组织,了解它们收集的数据。我们未发现将不安全的WPIR与艾滋病毒传播行为联系起来的定量研究。包含相关变量的数据集很少,而同时包含WPIR和艾滋病毒变量的数据集只能提供关联性的表面证据。肯尼亚和乌干达处理WPIR问题的组织没有收集到能够阐明WPIR与艾滋病毒之间联系的数据,但这两个组织拥有数据和社区网络,可为未来一项包括收集更多信息的研究提供良好基础。处理WPIR和艾滋病毒传播问题的团体之间的合作可以提供所需的定量证据,以确定WPIR结构性干预是否以及如何能够减少艾滋病毒传播。