Puchner Stefan B, Liu Ting, Mayrhofer Thomas, Truong Quynh A, Lee Hang, Fleg Jerome L, Nagurney John T, Udelson James E, Hoffmann Udo, Ferencik Maros
Department of Radiology and Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Radiology and Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Aug 19;64(7):684-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.039.
It is not known whether high-risk plaque, as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), permits improved early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) independently to the presence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with acute chest pain.
The primary aim of this study was to determine whether high-risk plaque features, as detected by CTA in the emergency department (ED), may improve diagnostic certainty of ACS independently and incrementally to the presence of significant CAD and clinical risk assessment in patients with acute chest pain but without objective evidence of myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction (MI).
We included patients randomized to the coronary CTA arm of the ROMICAT-II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer-Assisted Tomography II) trial. Readers assessed coronary CTA qualitatively for the presence of nonobstructive CAD (1% to 49% stenosis), significant CAD (≥50% or ≥70% stenosis), and the presence of at least 1 of the high-risk plaque features (positive remodeling, low <30 Hounsfield units plaque, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcium). In logistic regression analysis, we determined the association of high-risk plaque with ACS (MI or unstable angina pectoris) during the index hospitalization and whether this was independent of significant CAD and clinical risk assessment.
Overall, 37 of 472 patients who underwent coronary CTA with diagnostic image quality (mean age 53.9 ± 8.0 years; 52.8% men) had ACS (7.8%; MI n = 5; unstable angina pectoris n = 32). CAD was present in 262 patients (55.5%; nonobstructive CAD in 217 patients [46.0%] and significant CAD with ≥50% stenosis in 45 patients [9.5%]). High-risk plaques were more frequent in patients with ACS and remained a significant predictor of ACS (odds ratio [OR]: 8.9; 95% CI: 1.8 to 43.3; p = 0.006) after adjustment for ≥50% stenosis (OR: 38.6; 95% CI: 14.2 to 104.7; p < 0.001) and clinical risk assessment (age, sex, number of cardiovascular risk factors). Similar results were observed after adjustment for ≥70% stenosis.
In patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain but negative initial electrocardiogram and troponin, presence of high-risk plaques on coronary CTA increased the likelihood of ACS independent of significant CAD and clinical risk assessment (age, sex, and number of cardiovascular risk factors). (Multicenter Study to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Computed Tomography [ROMICAT-II]; NCT01084239).
在急性胸痛患者中,通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)检测到的高危斑块是否能独立于显著冠状动脉疾病(CAD)而改善急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的早期诊断尚不清楚。
本研究的主要目的是确定在急诊科(ED)通过CTA检测到的高危斑块特征是否能独立于显著CAD的存在以及急性胸痛但无心肌缺血或心肌梗死(MI)客观证据的患者的临床风险评估,从而提高ACS的诊断确定性。
我们纳入了随机分配到ROMICAT-II(利用计算机辅助断层扫描排除心肌梗死/缺血II)试验冠状动脉CTA组的患者。阅片者对冠状动脉CTA进行定性评估,以确定是否存在非阻塞性CAD(1%至49%狭窄)、显著CAD(≥50%或≥70%狭窄)以及是否存在至少1种高危斑块特征(阳性重塑、低密度<30亨氏单位斑块、餐巾环征、斑点状钙化)。在逻辑回归分析中,我们确定了高危斑块与指数住院期间ACS(MI或不稳定型心绞痛)的关联,以及这是否独立于显著CAD和临床风险评估。
总体而言,472例接受冠状动脉CTA且诊断图像质量良好的患者(平均年龄53.9±8.0岁;52.8%为男性)中有37例发生ACS(7.8%;MI 5例;不稳定型心绞痛32例)。262例患者存在CAD(55.5%;217例患者为非阻塞性CAD [46.0%],45例患者为≥50%狭窄的显著CAD [9.5%])。高危斑块在ACS患者中更常见,在调整≥50%狭窄(比值比[OR]:38.6;95%置信区间:14.2至104.7;p<0.001)和临床风险评估(年龄、性别、心血管危险因素数量)后,仍然是ACS的显著预测因素(OR:8.9;95%置信区间:1.8至43.3;p = 0.006)。在调整≥70%狭窄后观察到类似结果。
在因急性胸痛就诊于ED但初始心电图和肌钙蛋白阴性的患者中,冠状动脉CTA上存在高危斑块增加了ACS的可能性,独立于显著CAD和临床风险评估(年龄、性别和心血管危险因素数量)。(心脏计算机断层扫描排除心肌梗死多中心研究[ROMICAT-II];NCT01084239)