Suppr超能文献

三种常用的治疗III型Pilon骨折外固定装置的有限元分析

Finite element analysis of three commonly used external fixation devices for treating Type III pilon fractures.

作者信息

Ramlee Muhammad Hanif, Kadir Mohammed Rafiq Abdul, Murali Malliga Raman, Kamarul Tunku

机构信息

Medical Devices and Technology Group (MEDITEG), Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.

Tissue Engineering Group (TEG), National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence in Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty ofMedicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Med Eng Phys. 2014 Oct;36(10):1322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Abstract

Pilon fractures are commonly caused by high energy trauma and can result in long-term immobilization of patients. The use of an external fixator i.e. the (1) Delta, (2) Mitkovic or (3) Unilateral frame for treating type III pilon fractures is generally recommended by many experts owing to the stability provided by these constructs. This allows this type of fracture to heal quickly whilst permitting early mobilization. However, the stability of one fixator over the other has not been previously demonstrated. This study was conducted to determine the biomechanical stability of these external fixators in type III pilon fractures using finite element modelling. Three-dimensional models of the tibia, fibula, talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid, three cuneiforms and five metatarsal bones were reconstructed from previously obtained CT datasets. Bones were assigned with isotropic material properties, while the cartilage was assigned as hyperelastic springs with Mooney-Rivlin properties. Axial loads of 350 N and 70 N were applied at the tibia to simulate the stance and the swing phase of a gait cycle. To prevent rigid body motion, the calcaneus and metatarsals were fixed distally in all degrees of freedom. The results indicate that the model with the Delta frame produced the lowest relative micromovement (0.03 mm) compared to the Mitkovic (0.05 mm) and Unilateral (0.42 mm) fixators during the stance phase. The highest stress concentrations were found at the pin of the Unilateral external fixator (509.2 MPa) compared to the Mitkovic (286.0 MPa) and the Delta (266.7 MPa) frames. In conclusion, the Delta external fixator was found to be the most stable external fixator for treating type III pilon fractures.

摘要

Pilon骨折通常由高能创伤引起,可导致患者长期固定。由于这些固定结构提供的稳定性,许多专家普遍推荐使用外固定器,即(1)Delta、(2)Mitkovic或(3)单侧框架来治疗III型Pilon骨折。这使得这种类型的骨折能够快速愈合,同时允许早期活动。然而,此前尚未证明一种固定器相对于另一种固定器的稳定性。本研究旨在使用有限元建模确定这些外固定器在III型Pilon骨折中的生物力学稳定性。从先前获得的CT数据集中重建了胫骨、腓骨、距骨、跟骨、舟骨、骰骨、三块楔骨和五块跖骨的三维模型。骨骼被赋予各向同性材料特性,而软骨被赋予具有Mooney-Rivlin特性的超弹性弹簧。在胫骨上施加350 N和70 N的轴向载荷,以模拟步态周期的站立期和摆动期。为防止刚体运动,跟骨和跖骨在所有自由度上均在远端固定。结果表明,在站立期,与Mitkovic(0.05 mm)和单侧(0.42 mm)固定器相比,Delta框架模型产生的相对微动最低(0.03 mm)。与Mitkovic(286.0 MPa)和Delta(266.7 MPa)框架相比,单侧外固定器的针处应力集中最高(509.2 MPa)。总之,Delta外固定器被认为是治疗III型Pilon骨折最稳定的外固定器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验