Suppr超能文献

糖尿病性多发性神经病的快速筛查:在门诊临床环境中准确症状和体征的选择

Rapid screening of diabetic polyneuropathy: selection of accurate symptoms and signs in an outpatient clinical setting.

作者信息

Najafi Laily, Khamseh Mohammad E, Malek Mojtaba, Baradaran Hamid R, Aghili Seyed Mojtaba, Kia Maryam, Aghili Rokhsareh

机构信息

Endocrine Research Center, Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(7):519-27.

Abstract

Clinical assessment of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) involves the evaluation of symptoms and signs. Although there are numerous tools to evaluate DPN, there is still a need to determine the most sensitive, specific, and accurate tests to detect DPN in a busy outpatient clinical setting. A total of 107 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined using Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI). Total score of the instrument was used as a standard to calculate sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of every single item of MNSI to find the most accurate and applicable test for evaluation of DPN. In patients' history, the most sensitive (99.4%) and accurate (78%) symptoms were muscle cramp and weakness. Numbness and prickling had lower sensitivity (72.6% and 67.9%, respectively) but greater specificity (65.2% and 47.8%). In physical assessment, the most accurate signs were appearance of feet (81.3%), ankle reflexes (67.2%), and vibration perception (63.5%). Monofilament test had a sensitivity of 16.7%, accuracy of 31.7% with specificity of 87%. Findings show that symptoms such as a muscle cramp, weakness, numbness, and prickling, as well as signs such as ankle reflexes, appearance of feet, and vibration could be used as the most accurate tests for rapid diagnosis of DPN. In addition, the results suggest that monofilament examination may not be the optimum test to detect high risk patients.

摘要

远端对称性多发性神经病(DPN)的临床评估包括症状和体征的评估。尽管有许多评估DPN的工具,但在繁忙的门诊临床环境中,仍需要确定最敏感、特异和准确的检测方法来检测DPN。使用密歇根神经病变筛查工具(MNSI)对107例2型糖尿病患者进行了检查。以该工具的总分作为标准,计算MNSI各项的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性,以找到评估DPN最准确且适用的检测方法。在患者病史方面,最敏感(99.4%)且准确(78%)的症状是肌肉痉挛和无力。麻木和刺痛的敏感性较低(分别为72.6%和67.9%),但特异性较高(分别为65.2%和47.8%)。在体格检查中,最准确的体征是足部外观(81.3%)、踝反射(67.2%)和振动觉(63.5%)。单丝试验的敏感性为16.7%,准确性为31.7%,特异性为87%。研究结果表明,肌肉痉挛、无力、麻木和刺痛等症状,以及踝反射、足部外观和振动觉等体征可作为快速诊断DPN的最准确检测方法。此外,结果表明单丝检查可能不是检测高危患者的最佳检测方法。

相似文献

2
Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening.
J Diabetes Complications. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2003.12.006.
5
Validation of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006 Jul;108(5):477-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Sep 16.
7
A simplified protocol to screen for distal polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006 Sep;73(3):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.02.005. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验