Lee Thomas S, Ducic Yadranko, Gordin Eli, Stroman David
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
Otolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery Associates, Fort Worth, Texas ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2014 Sep;7(3):175-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372521.
With increased awareness and liberal screening of trauma patients with identified risk factors, recent case series demonstrate improved early diagnosis of carotid artery trauma before they become problematio. There remains a need for unified screening criteria for both intracranial and extracranial carotid trauma. In the absence of contraindications, antithrombotic agents should be considered in blunt carotid artery injuries, as there is a significant risk of progression of vessel injury with observation alone. Despite CTA being used as a common screening modality, it appears to lack sufficient sensitivity. DSA remains to be the gold standard in screening. Endovascular techniques are becoming more widely accepted as the primary surgical modality in the treatment of blunt extracranial carotid injuries and penetrating/blunt intracranial carotid lessions. Nonetheless, open surgical approaches are still needed for the treatment of penetrating extracranial carotid injuries and in patients with unfavorable lesions for endovascular intervention.
随着对具有明确危险因素的创伤患者的认识提高和筛查放宽,近期的病例系列表明,颈动脉创伤在变得棘手之前能得到更早的诊断。对于颅内和颅外颈动脉创伤,仍需要统一的筛查标准。在没有禁忌证的情况下,对于钝性颈动脉损伤应考虑使用抗血栓药物,因为仅观察有血管损伤进展的显著风险。尽管CTA被用作常见的筛查方式,但它似乎缺乏足够的敏感性。DSA仍然是筛查的金标准。血管内技术作为钝性颅外颈动脉损伤以及穿透性/钝性颅内颈动脉损伤治疗的主要手术方式正被更广泛地接受。尽管如此,对于穿透性颅外颈动脉损伤以及血管内介入治疗病变不佳的患者,仍需要开放手术方法。