Suppr超能文献

使用多变量数据分析评估制剂和工艺变量对口腔黏膜黏附膜力学性能的影响。

Evaluation of the influence of formulation and process variables on mechanical properties of oral mucoadhesive films using multivariate data analysis.

作者信息

Landová Hana, Vetchý David, Gajdziok Jan, Doležel Petr, Muselík Jan, Dvořáčková Kateřina, Jekl Vladimír, Hauptman Karel, Knotek Zdeněk

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackého třida 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.

Avian and Exotic Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackého třida 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:179568. doi: 10.1155/2014/179568. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

Abstract

Oral mucosa is an attractive region for the local and systemic application of many drugs. Oral mucoadhesive films are preferred for their prolonged time of residence, the improved bioavailability of the drug they contain, their painless application, their protection against lesions, and their nonirritating properties. This work was focused on preparation of nonmedicated carmellose-based films using both solvent casting and impregnation methods, respectively. Moreover, a modern approach to evaluation of mucoadhesive films applying analysis of texture and subsequent multivariate data analysis was used. In this experiment, puncture strength strongly correlated with tensile strength and could be used to obtain necessary information about the mechanical film characteristics in films prepared using both methods. Puncture work and tensile work were not correlated in films prepared using the solvent casting method, as increasing the amount of glycerol led to an increase in the puncture work in thinner films. All measured texture parameters in films prepared by impregnation were significantly smaller compared to films prepared by solvent casting. Moreover, a relationship between the amount of glycerol and film thickness was observed, and a greater recalculated tensile/puncture strength was needed for an increased thickness in films prepared by impregnation.

摘要

口腔黏膜是许多药物局部和全身应用的理想部位。口腔黏膜粘附膜因其较长的驻留时间、所含药物生物利用度的提高、无痛给药、对病变的保护作用以及无刺激性等特性而备受青睐。本研究分别采用溶剂浇铸法和浸渍法制备了不含药物的羧甲基纤维素基薄膜。此外,还采用了一种通过质地分析和后续多变量数据分析来评估黏膜粘附膜的现代方法。在本实验中,穿刺强度与拉伸强度密切相关,可用于获取两种制备方法所得薄膜机械性能的必要信息。在溶剂浇铸法制备的薄膜中,穿刺功与拉伸功不相关,因为在较薄的薄膜中增加甘油用量会导致穿刺功增加。浸渍法制备的薄膜所有测量的质地参数均显著小于溶剂浇铸法制备的薄膜。此外,还观察到甘油用量与薄膜厚度之间的关系,浸渍法制备的薄膜厚度增加时,需要更高的重新计算的拉伸/穿刺强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f82/4129671/442417e81698/BMRI2014-179568.001.jpg

相似文献

2
Design and evaluation of mucoadhesive oral films containing sodium hyaluronate using multivariate data analysis.
Pharm Dev Technol. 2017 Mar;22(2):229-236. doi: 10.1080/10837450.2016.1194857. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Determination of dependencies among in vitro and in vivo properties of prepared mucoadhesive buccal films using multivariate data analysis.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014 Apr;86(3):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
4
Evaluation of self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems using multivariate methods to optimize permeability of captopril oral films.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019 Mar 15;130:215-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.039. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
7
8
Mucoadhesive films as perspective oral dosage form.
Ceska Slov Farm. 2013 Feb;62(1):4-11.
9
Mucoadhesive buccal films based on a graft co-polymer - A mucin-retentive hydrogel scaffold.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020 Jan 15;142:105142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105142. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
Mucoadhesive films based on gellan gum/pectin blends as potential platform for buccal drug delivery.
Pharm Dev Technol. 2020 Feb;25(2):159-167. doi: 10.1080/10837450.2019.1682608. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Determination of dependencies among in vitro and in vivo properties of prepared mucoadhesive buccal films using multivariate data analysis.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014 Apr;86(3):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Mechanical strength test for orodispersible and buccal films.
Int J Pharm. 2014 Jan 30;461(1-2):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.033. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
Oromucosal film preparations: classification and characterization methods.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013 Sep;10(9):1303-17. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2013.804058. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
5
6
Mucoadhesive films as perspective oral dosage form.
Ceska Slov Farm. 2013 Feb;62(1):4-11.
7
In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films.
J Control Release. 2013 Feb 28;166(1):10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.11.019. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
8
Development and evaluation of tamarind seed xyloglucan-based mucoadhesive buccal films of rizatriptan benzoate.
Carbohydr Polym. 2013 Jan 16;91(2):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.062. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011 Feb;77(2):187-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.023. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
10
Characterisation of freeze-dried wafers and solvent evaporated films as potential drug delivery systems to mucosal surfaces.
Int J Pharm. 2010 Apr 15;389(1-2):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验