das Neves Patrícia Bolzan Agnelli, Agnelli José Augusto Marcondes, Kurachi Cristina, de Souza Clovis Wesley Oliveira
Department of Morphology and Pathology, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2014;25(2):141-5. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302398.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate physical properties and antibacterial activity of a light-activated composite modified with silver nanoparticles. Discs were produced with unmodified resin (control group - CG) and modified resin with silver nanoparticles at two concentrations, 0.3% wt (MR03) and 0.6% wt (MR06). Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus biofilms were induced in vitro by incubation of discs in a 20% sucrose medium, followed by sonication and counting of viable cells after 1, 4 and 7 days (n=9). The arithmetic roughness of all three groups was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (n=9). Compression assay was conducted in all groups to measure the compressive strength at failure and elasticity modulus (n=5). Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α=0.05%). At all three time points the number of viable cells was statistically lower for MR03 and MR06 compared with CG, for both specimens. MR03 and MR06 showed no significant differences. Microscopic analysis demonstrated no significant differences for roughness among the three groups (p>0.05). The MR03 was stronger to compression than CG, and MR06 was statistically lower than CG and MR03. It was concluded that the MR03 were less conducive to biofilm growth, without compromising the strength in compression and surface roughness.
本研究的目的是评估用银纳米颗粒改性的光活化复合材料的物理性能和抗菌活性。用未改性树脂(对照组-CG)以及含0.3%重量比(MR03)和0.6%重量比(MR06)两种浓度银纳米颗粒的改性树脂制作圆盘。通过将圆盘在20%蔗糖培养基中孵育来体外诱导变形链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌生物膜,随后进行超声处理,并在1、4和7天后对活细胞进行计数(n=9)。通过原子力显微镜评估所有三组的算术粗糙度(n=9)。对所有组进行压缩试验以测量破坏时的抗压强度和弹性模量(n=5)。数据进行方差分析和Tukey检验(α=0.05%)。在所有三个时间点,对于两个样本,MR03和MR06的活细胞数量与CG相比在统计学上均较低。MR03和MR06之间无显著差异。显微镜分析表明三组之间的粗糙度无显著差异(p>0.05)。MR03的抗压性比CG强,而MR06在统计学上低于CG和MR03。得出的结论是,MR03不利于生物膜生长,同时不影响抗压强度和表面粗糙度。