Suppr超能文献

一项VELOUR事后亚组分析:接受阿柏西普和FOLFIRI治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的预后分组和治疗结果

A VELOUR post hoc subset analysis: prognostic groups and treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with aflibercept and FOLFIRI.

作者信息

Chau Ian, Joulain Florence, Iqbal Sheikh Usman, Bridgewater John

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 20;14:605. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-605.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The VELOUR study demonstrated a survival benefit for FOLFIRI + aflibercept versus FOLFIRI + placebo in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who progressed on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Continued divergence of overall survival (OS) curves in the intension to treat (ITT) population, with the survival advantage persisting beyond median survival time, suggested subpopulations might have different magnitudes of survival gain. Additionally, 10% of patients within VELOUR had recurrence during or within 6 months of completing oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy (adjuvant fast relapsers)--previously identified as having poorer survival outcomes.

METHODS

To determine which patients received the greatest benefit from FOLFIRI-aflibercept, a post hoc multivariate analysis of the VELOUR ITT population was conducted. Prognostic factors identified were applied to the ITT population, excluding adjuvant fast relapsers, to derive OS prognostic profiles.

RESULTS

The better efficacy subgroup was identified as patients within VELOUR exclusive of adjuvant fast relapsers and had performance status (PS) 0 with any number of metastatic site or PS 1 with <2 metastatic site. A significant improvement in efficacy outcome was observed with aflibercept in the better efficacy subgroup. Median OS for FOLFIRI-aflibercept and FOLFIRI-placebo:16.2 and 13.1 months (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.86); median progression free survival (PFS): 7.2 and 4.8 months (adjusted HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.57-0.80); and objective response rate (ORR): 24% versus 11% respectively. Poorer efficacy subgroup comprised of adjuvant fast relapsers or patients with PS2 or PS1 with ≥ 2 metastatic sites. In poorer efficacy subgroup, no benefit was seen with aflibercept. Median OS for FOLFIRI-aflibercept and FOLFIRI-placebo: 10.4 and 9.6 months (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.78-1.21) respectively with no improvement in PFS or ORR.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that within VELOUR, patients in the better efficacy subgroup may derive enhanced benefit from treatment with FOLFIRI-aflibercept. These prognostic criteria may guide practitioners toward optimal use of targeted biologicals in appropriate second-line mCRC patients.

摘要

背景

VELOUR研究表明,对于在基于奥沙利铂的化疗中病情进展的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者,FOLFIRI联合阿柏西普对比FOLFIRI联合安慰剂具有生存获益。在意向性治疗(ITT)人群中,总生存(OS)曲线持续分离,生存优势持续超过中位生存时间,提示亚组人群可能有不同程度的生存获益增加。此外,VELOUR研究中有10%的患者在完成基于奥沙利铂的辅助治疗期间或之后6个月内复发(辅助治疗快速复发者)——此前已确定其生存结局较差。

方法

为确定哪些患者从FOLFIRI-阿柏西普治疗中获益最大,对VELOUR研究的ITT人群进行了事后多变量分析。将确定的预后因素应用于ITT人群(不包括辅助治疗快速复发者),以得出OS预后特征。

结果

疗效较好的亚组被确定为VELOUR研究中不包括辅助治疗快速复发者且体能状态(PS)为0(有任意数量转移灶)或PS为1(转移灶<2个)的患者。在疗效较好的亚组中,观察到阿柏西普在疗效结局方面有显著改善。FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组和FOLFIRI-安慰剂组的中位OS分别为16.2个月和13.1个月(调整后风险比[HR]=0.73;95%置信区间[CI]:0.61-0.86);中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为7.2个月和4.8个月(调整后HR=0.68;95%CI:0.57-0.80);客观缓解率(ORR)分别为24%和11%。疗效较差的亚组包括辅助治疗快速复发者或PS为2或PS为1且转移灶≥2个的患者。在疗效较差的亚组中,未观察到阿柏西普有获益。FOLFIRI-阿柏西普组和FOLFIRI-安慰剂组的中位OS分别为10.4个月和9.6个月(调整后HR=0.97;95%CI:0.78-1.21),PFS或ORR均无改善。

结论

该分析表明,在VELOUR研究中,疗效较好亚组的患者可能从FOLFIRI-阿柏西普治疗中获得更大益处。这些预后标准可指导临床医生在合适的二线mCRC患者中优化使用靶向生物制剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2c4/4149045/07e0ae03347d/12885_2013_4787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验