Er Mehmet Serhan, Altinel Levent, Eroglu Mehmet, Verim Ozgur, Demir Teyfik, Atmaca Halil
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07985, Turkey.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Aug 22;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-48.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of various types of anchor applications with or without augmentation in both osteopenic and severely osteoporotic bone models.
Two different types of suture anchors were tested in severely osteoporotic (SOP) and osteopenic polyurethane (PU) foam blocks using an established protocol. An Instron machine applied static loading parallel to the axis of insertion until failure, and the mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. The mode of failure (anchor pullout, suture tear) was recorded. The anchors tested included the Corkscrew (CS) (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL, USA) (without augmentation, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)-augmented, and bioabsorbable tricalcium phosphate (TCP) cement-augmented) and Corkscrew FT II (CS FT II) 5.5 mm (without augmentation as used routinely).
The mean failure loads for both SOP and osteopenic PU foam blocks, respectively, were as follows: CS, 16.2 and 212.4 N; CS with TCP, 75.2 and 396 N; CS with PMMA, 101.2 and 528.8 N; CS FT II, 13.8 and 339.8 N.
Augmentation of CS with TCP or PMMA would be essential to SOP bones. In the osteopenic bone model, although anchor fixation augmented with PMMA is the best fixation method, CS augmented with TCP cement or CS FT II without any need for augmentation may also be used as an alternative.
本研究的目的是比较在骨质减少和严重骨质疏松骨模型中,各种类型的锚钉应用(有无增强)的结果。
使用既定方案,在严重骨质疏松(SOP)和骨质减少的聚氨酯(PU)泡沫块中测试两种不同类型的缝合锚钉。一台英斯特朗材料试验机沿插入轴方向施加静态载荷直至失效,并计算锚钉的平均失效强度。记录失效模式(锚钉拔出、缝线撕裂)。测试的锚钉包括螺旋锚钉(CS)(美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯市的Arthrex公司)(无增强、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)增强和生物可吸收磷酸三钙(TCP)骨水泥增强)以及5.5毫米的螺旋锚钉FT II(CS FT II)(按常规使用无增强)。
SOP和骨质减少的PU泡沫块的平均失效载荷分别如下:CS,16.2牛和212.4牛;TCP增强的CS,75.2牛和396牛;PMMA增强的CS,101.2牛和528.8牛;CS FT II,13.8牛和339.8牛。
用TCP或PMMA增强CS对SOP骨至关重要。在骨质减少骨模型中,虽然PMMA增强的锚钉固定是最佳固定方法,但TCP骨水泥增强的CS或无需增强的CS FT II也可作为替代方法使用。