Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chest. 2015 Jan;147(1):94-101. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-3050.
Despite its frequency and impact, delirium is poorly recognized in postoperative and critically ill patients. EEG is highly sensitive to delirium but, as currently used, it is not diagnostic. To develop an EEG-based tool for delirium detection with a limited number of electrodes, we determined the optimal electrode derivation and EEG characteristic to discriminate delirium from nondelirium.
Standard EEGs were recorded in 28 patients with delirium and 28 age- and sex-matched patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery and were not delirious, as classified by experts using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, criteria. The first minute of artifact-free EEG data with eyes closed as well as with eyes open was selected. For each derivation, six EEG parameters were evaluated. Using Mann-Whitney U tests, all combinations of derivations and parameters were compared between patients with delirium and those without. Corresponding P values, corrected for multiple testing, were ranked.
The largest difference between patients with and without delirium and highest area under the receiver operating curve (0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00) was found during the eyes-closed periods of the EEG, using electrode derivation F8-Pz (frontal-parietal) and relative δ power (median [interquartile range (IQR)] for delirium, 0.59 [IQR, 0.47-0.71] and for nondelirium, 0.20 [IQR, 0.17-0.26]; P = .0000000000018). With a cutoff value of 0.37, it resulted in a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI, 88%-100%).
In a homogenous population of nonsedated patients who had undergone cardiothoracic surgery, we observed that relative δ power from an eyes-closed EEG recording with only two electrodes in a frontal-parietal derivation can distinguish among patients who have delirium and those who do not.
尽管谵妄在术后和重症患者中很常见且影响较大,但它并未得到充分认识。脑电图对谵妄高度敏感,但目前的应用并不能诊断谵妄。为了开发一种基于脑电图的工具,以便使用有限数量的电极检测谵妄,我们确定了最佳的电极推导和脑电图特征,以区分谵妄和非谵妄。
我们对 28 名患有谵妄的患者和 28 名年龄和性别匹配的、接受过心胸外科手术且无谵妄的患者进行了标准脑电图记录,这些患者的诊断均由专家根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 4 版标准进行。选择闭眼和睁眼后 1 分钟无伪迹的脑电图数据。对于每个推导,评估了六个脑电图参数。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验比较了谵妄患者和非谵妄患者之间的所有推导和参数组合。对相应的 P 值进行了多重检验校正,并进行了排序。
在闭眼期脑电图中,F8-Pz(额顶)电极推导和相对 δ 功率的差异最大(患者有谵妄时为 0.59[四分位距(IQR),0.47-0.71],患者无谵妄时为 0.20[IQR,0.17-0.26]),差异有统计学意义(P =.0000000000018),且受试者工作特征曲线下面积最大(0.99;95%置信区间,0.97-1.00),具有最高的诊断准确性。当截断值为 0.37 时,其敏感性为 100%(95%置信区间,100%-100%),特异性为 96%(95%置信区间,88%-100%)。
在一个非镇静、心胸外科手术后的同质人群中,我们观察到在额顶推导中仅使用两个电极的闭眼脑电图记录中的相对 δ 功率可以区分患有谵妄的患者和不患有谵妄的患者。