Lins Sabine, Hayder-Beichel Daniela, Rücker Gerta, Motschall Edith, Antes Gerd, Meyer Gabriele, Langer Gero
German Cochrane Centre, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Freiburg, Berliner Allee 29, Freiburg, Germany, 79110.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 1;2014(9):CD009126. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009126.pub2.
Informal carers of people with dementia can suffer from depressive symptoms, emotional distress and other physiological, social and financial consequences.
This review focuses on three main objectives:To:1) produce a quantitative review of the efficacy of telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia;2) synthesize qualitative studies to explore carers' experiences of receiving telephone counselling and counsellors' experiences of conducting telephone counselling; and3) integrate 1) and 2) to identify aspects of the intervention that are valued and work well, and those interventional components that should be improved or redesigned.
The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE, CINAHL, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO, Web of Science, DIMDI databases, Springer database, Science direct and trial registers were searched on 3 May 2011 and updated on 25 February 2013. A Forward Citation search was conducted for included studies in Web of Science and Google Scholar. We used the Related Articles service of PubMed for included studies, contacted experts and hand-searched abstracts of five congresses.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cross-over trials that compared telephone counselling for informal carers of people with dementia against no treatment, usual care or friendly calls for chatting were included evaluation of efficacy. Qualitative studies with qualitative methods of data collection and analysis were also included to address experiences with telephone counselling.
Two authors independently screened articles for inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the quantitative trials with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool and the qualitative studies with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) tool. The authors conducted meta-analyses, but reported some results in narrative form due to clinical heterogeneity. The authors synthesised the qualitative data and integrated quantitative RCT data with the qualitative data.
Nine RCTs and two qualitative studies were included. Six studies investigated telephone counselling without additional intervention, one study combined telephone counselling with video sessions, and two studies combined it with video sessions and a workbook. All quantitative studies had a high risk of bias in terms of blinding of participants and outcome assessment. Most studies provided no information about random sequence generation and allocation concealment. The quality of the qualitative studies ('thin descriptions') was assessed as moderate. Meta-analyses indicated a reduction of depressive symptoms for telephone counselling without additional intervention (three trials, 163 participants: standardised mean different (SMD) 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.63, P value 0.04; moderate quality evidence). The estimated effects on other outcomes (burden, distress, anxiety, quality of life, self-efficacy, satisfaction and social support) were uncertain and differences could not be excluded (burden: four trials, 165 participants: SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.90, P value 0.05; moderate quality evidence; support: two trials, 67 participants: SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.73, P value 0.32; low quality evidence). None of the quantitative studies included reported adverse effects or harm due to telephone counselling. Three analytical themes (barriers and facilitators for successful implementation of telephone counselling, counsellor's emotional attitude and content of telephone counselling) and 16 descriptive themes that present the carers' needs for telephone counselling were identified in the thematic synthesis. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data shows potential for improvement. For example, no RCT reported that the counsellor provided 24-hour availability or that there was debriefing of the counsellor. Also, the qualitative studies covered a limited range of ways of performing telephone counselling.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that telephone counselling can reduce depressive symptoms for carers of people with dementia and that telephone counselling meets important needs of the carer. This result needs to be confirmed in future studies that evaluate efficacy through robust RCTs and the experience aspect through qualitative studies with rich data.
痴呆症患者的非正式照料者可能会出现抑郁症状、情绪困扰以及其他生理、社会和经济方面的后果。
本综述聚焦于三个主要目标:1)对针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的电话咨询效果进行定量综述;2)综合定性研究,以探究照料者接受电话咨询的体验以及咨询师进行电话咨询的体验;3)整合1)和2),以确定干预措施中受重视且效果良好的方面,以及那些应改进或重新设计的干预组成部分。
于2011年5月3日检索了Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组专业注册库、Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、MEDLINE在研数据库、EMBASE、CINAHL、PSYNDEX、PsycINFO、科学引文索引、DIMDI数据库、施普林格数据库、Science direct以及试验注册库,并于2013年2月25日进行了更新。对科学引文索引和谷歌学术中纳入的研究进行了正向引文检索。我们利用PubMed的相关文章服务获取纳入研究,联系了专家并手工检索了五场大会的摘要。
将比较针对痴呆症患者非正式照料者的电话咨询与无治疗、常规护理或友好聊天电话的随机对照试验(RCT)或交叉试验纳入疗效评估。还纳入了采用定性数据收集和分析方法的定性研究,以探讨电话咨询的体验。
两位作者独立筛选文章以确定纳入标准,提取数据,并使用Cochrane“偏倚风险”工具评估定量试验,使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)工具评估定性研究。作者进行了荟萃分析,但由于临床异质性,部分结果以叙述形式报告。作者综合了定性数据,并将定量RCT数据与定性数据相结合。
纳入了9项RCT和2项定性研究。6项研究调查了无额外干预的电话咨询,1项研究将电话咨询与视频会议相结合,2项研究将其与视频会议和工作手册相结合。所有定量研究在参与者和结局评估的盲法方面均存在较高的偏倚风险。大多数研究未提供关于随机序列生成和分配隐藏的信息。定性研究的质量(“描述简略”)被评估为中等。荟萃分析表明,无额外干预的电话咨询可减轻抑郁症状(三项试验,163名参与者:标准化均数差(SMD)0.32,95%置信区间(CI)0.01至0.63,P值0.04;中等质量证据)。对其他结局(负担、困扰、焦虑、生活质量、自我效能感、满意度和社会支持)的估计效果不确定,差异不能排除(负担:四项试验,165名参与者:SMD 0.45,95%CI -0.01至0.90,P值0.05;中等质量证据;支持:两项试验,67名参与者:SMD 0.25,95%CI -0.24至0.73,P值0.32;低质量证据)。纳入的定量研究均未报告电话咨询导致的不良反应或伤害。在主题综合中确定了三个分析主题(电话咨询成功实施的障碍和促进因素、咨询师的情感态度以及电话咨询的内容)和16个描述性主题,这些主题呈现了照料者对电话咨询的需求。定量和定性数据的整合显示出改进的潜力。例如,没有RCT报告咨询师提供24小时服务或对咨询师进行汇报。此外,定性研究涵盖的电话咨询实施方式范围有限。
有证据表明电话咨询可减轻痴呆症患者照料者的抑郁症状,且电话咨询满足了照料者的重要需求。这一结果需要在未来通过严格的RCT评估疗效以及通过数据丰富的定性研究评估体验方面的研究中得到证实。