Suppr超能文献

印戒细胞组织学类型的结直肠癌腹膜转移癌患者接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗后的预后较差。

Poor outcome after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis with signet ring cell histology.

作者信息

van Oudheusden T R, Braam H J, Nienhuijs S W, Wiezer M J, van Ramshorst B, Luyer P, de Hingh I H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;111(2):237-42. doi: 10.1002/jso.23784. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Signet ring cell cancer (SRCC) patients have a poor oncologic outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether the potential drawbacks of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) outweigh the benefits in patients with peritoneally metastasized SRCC.

METHODS

Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin referred to two tertiary centers between April 2005 and December 2013 were identified and retrospectively analyzed. Data were compared between SRCC histology and other differentiations.

RESULTS

Three-hundred-fifty-one patients were referred for CRS+HIPEC among which 20 (5.7%) patients were identified with SRCC histology. CRS + HIPEC was performed in 16 of these 20 (80%) and 252 out of the 331 remaining patients (76.1%). A higher proportion of patients in the SRCC-group were diagnosed with N2 stage (62.5% vs. 36.1%, P=0.04). A macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 87.5% and 97.2% respectively (P=0.04). Median survival was 14.1 months compared to 35.1 months (P<0.01). Recurrence occurred in 68.8% of the SRCC patients and in 43.7% of the other histology patients (P=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with SRCC and PC treated with CRS+HIPEC have a poor median survival only slightly reaching over 1 year. In the presence of other relative contraindications, SRCC histology should refrain a surgeon from performing CRS and HIPEC.

摘要

背景

印戒细胞癌(SRCC)患者的肿瘤学预后较差。本研究的目的是确定热灌注化疗(HIPEC)的潜在弊端是否超过其对腹膜转移SRCC患者的益处。

方法

对2005年4月至2013年12月转诊至两个三级中心的结直肠癌源性腹膜癌(PC)患者进行识别并进行回顾性分析。比较SRCC组织学与其他分化类型的数据。

结果

351例患者接受了CRS+HIPEC治疗,其中20例(5.7%)患者为SRCC组织学类型。这20例患者中有16例(80%)接受了CRS+HIPEC治疗,其余331例患者中有252例(76.1%)接受了该治疗。SRCC组中诊断为N2期的患者比例更高(62.5%对36.1%,P=0.04)。宏观完全切除率分别为87.5%和97.2%(P=0.04)。中位生存期分别为14.1个月和35.1个月(P<0.01)。SRCC患者的复发率为68.8%,其他组织学类型患者的复发率为43.7%(P=0.05)。

结论

接受CRS+HIPEC治疗的SRCC和PC患者中位生存期较差,仅略超过1年。在存在其他相对禁忌证的情况下,SRCC组织学类型应使外科医生避免进行CRS和HIPEC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验