McDonald Catherine C, Seacrist Thomas S, Lee Yi-Ching, Loeb Helen, Kandadai Venk, Winston Flaura K
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
The Center for Injury Research and Prevention at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Proc Int Driv Symp Hum Factors Driv Assess Train Veh Des. 2013;2013:439-445. doi: 10.17077/drivingassessment.1524.
Driving simulators can be used to evaluate driving performance under controlled, safe conditions. Teen drivers are at particular risk for motor vehicle crashes and simulated driving can provide important information on performance. We developed a new simulator protocol, the Simulated Driving Assessment (SDA), with the goal of providing a new tool for driver assessment and a common outcome measure for evaluation of training programs. As an initial effort to examine the validity of the SDA to differentiate performance according to experience, this analysis compared driving behaviors and crashes between novice teens (n=20) and experienced adults (n=17) on a high fidelity simulator for one common crash scenario, a rear-end crash. We examined headway time and crashes during a lead truck with sudden braking event in our SDA. We found that 35% of the novice teens crashed and none of the experienced adults crashed in this lead truck braking event; 50% of the teens versus 25% of the adults had a headway time <3 seconds at the time of truck braking. Among the 10 teens with <3 seconds headway time, 70% crashed. Among all participants with a headway time of 2-3 seconds, further investigation revealed descriptive differences in throttle position and brake pedal force when comparing teens who crashed, teens who did not crash and adults (none of whom crashed). Even with a relatively small sample, we found statistically significant differences in headway time for adults and teens, providing preliminary construct validation for our new SDA.
驾驶模拟器可用于在可控的安全条件下评估驾驶表现。青少年驾驶员发生机动车碰撞的风险尤其高,模拟驾驶可为驾驶表现提供重要信息。我们开发了一种新的模拟器协议,即模拟驾驶评估(SDA),旨在提供一种新的驾驶员评估工具以及用于评估培训项目的通用结果指标。作为检验SDA根据经验区分驾驶表现有效性的初步尝试,本分析比较了新手青少年(n = 20)和有经验的成年人(n = 17)在高保真模拟器上针对一种常见碰撞场景(追尾碰撞)的驾驶行为和碰撞情况。在我们的SDA中,我们研究了在前方卡车突然制动事件期间的车间时距和碰撞情况。我们发现,在前方卡车制动事件中,35%的新手青少年发生了碰撞,而所有有经验的成年人都没有发生碰撞;在卡车制动时,50%的青少年与25%的成年人车间时距小于3秒。在车间时距小于3秒的10名青少年中,70%发生了碰撞。在所有车间时距为2至3秒的参与者中,进一步调查发现,在比较发生碰撞的青少年、未发生碰撞的青少年和成年人(他们都没有发生碰撞)时,油门位置和制动踏板力存在描述性差异。即使样本量相对较小,我们发现成年人和青少年在车间时距上存在统计学显著差异,为我们新的SDA提供了初步的结构效度验证。