Zhao Yuanyuan, Heinke Dietmar
Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.020. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the performance disadvantage when detecting a target presented at a previously cued location. The current paper contributes to the long-standing debate whether IOR is caused by attentional processing or perceptual processing. We present a series of four experiments which varied the cue luminance in mixed and blocked conditions. We hypothesised that if inhibition was initialized by an attentional process the size of IOR should not vary in the blocked condition as participants should be able to adapt to the level of cue luminance. However, if a perceptual process triggers inhibition both experimental manipulations should lead to varying levels of IOR. Indeed, we found evidence for the latter hypothesis. In addition, we also varied the target luminance in blocked and mixed condition. Both manipulations, cue luminance and target luminance, affected IOR in an additive fashion suggesting that the two stimuli affect human behaviour on different processing stages.
返回抑制(IOR)是指在检测先前提示位置出现的目标时的表现劣势。当前论文有助于解决关于IOR是由注意力加工还是知觉加工引起的长期争论。我们进行了一系列四个实验,在混合条件和分组条件下改变提示亮度。我们假设,如果抑制是由注意力过程启动的,那么在分组条件下IOR的大小不应变化,因为参与者应该能够适应提示亮度水平。然而,如果知觉过程触发抑制,那么两种实验操作都应导致不同水平的IOR。事实上,我们发现了支持后一种假设的证据。此外,我们还在分组条件和混合条件下改变了目标亮度。提示亮度和目标亮度这两种操作都以相加的方式影响IOR,这表明这两种刺激在不同的加工阶段影响人类行为。