Golinvaux Nicholas S, Bohl Daniel D, Basques Bryce A, Grauer Jonathan N
From the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Nov 15;39(24):2019-23. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000598.
Cross-sectional study.
To objectively evaluate the ability of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, which are used as the foundation for administratively coded national databases, to identify preoperative anemia in patients undergoing spinal fusion.
National database research in spine surgery continues to rise. However, the validity of studies based on administratively coded data, such as the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, are dependent on the accuracy of ICD-9 coding. Such coding has previously been found to have poor sensitivity to conditions such as obesity and infection.
A cross-sectional study was performed at an academic medical center. Hospital-reported anemia ICD-9 codes (those used for administratively coded databases) were directly compared with the chart-documented preoperative hematocrits (true laboratory values). A patient was deemed to have preoperative anemia if the preoperative hematocrit was less than the lower end of the normal range (36.0% for females and 41.0% for males).
The study included 260 patients. Of these, 37 patients (14.2%) were anemic; however, only 10 patients (3.8%) received an "anemia" ICD-9 code. Of the 10 patients coded as anemic, 7 were anemic by definition, whereas 3 were not, and thus were miscoded. This equates to an ICD-9 code sensitivity of 0.19, with a specificity of 0.99, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.70 and 0.88, respectively.
This study uses preoperative anemia to demonstrate the potential inaccuracies of ICD-9 coding. These results have implications for publications using databases that are compiled from ICD-9 coding data. Furthermore, the findings of the current investigation raise concerns regarding the accuracy of additional comorbidities. Although administrative databases are powerful resources that provide large sample sizes, it is crucial that we further consider the quality of the data source relative to its intended purpose.
横断面研究。
客观评估作为国家行政编码数据库基础的国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码识别接受脊柱融合手术患者术前贫血的能力。
脊柱外科领域的国家数据库研究持续增加。然而,基于行政编码数据(如全国住院患者样本)的研究有效性取决于ICD - 9编码的准确性。此前已发现这种编码对肥胖和感染等情况的敏感性较差。
在一家学术医疗中心进行横断面研究。将医院报告的贫血ICD - 9编码(用于行政编码数据库的编码)与病历记录的术前血细胞比容(真实实验室值)直接进行比较。如果术前血细胞比容低于正常范围下限(女性为36.0%,男性为41.0%),则该患者被视为术前贫血。
该研究纳入了260例患者。其中,37例患者(14.2%)贫血;然而,只有10例患者(3.8%)被赋予“贫血”的ICD - 9编码。在被编码为贫血的10例患者中,7例根据定义为贫血,而3例并非贫血,因此属于编码错误。这相当于ICD - 9编码的敏感性为0.19,特异性为0.99,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.70和0.88。
本研究利用术前贫血来证明ICD - 9编码可能存在的不准确之处。这些结果对使用由ICD - 9编码数据汇编而成的数据库的出版物具有启示意义。此外,当前调查结果引发了对其他合并症准确性的担忧。尽管行政数据库是提供大样本量的强大资源,但至关重要的是,我们要根据其预期用途进一步考虑数据源的质量。