Tahririan Mohammad Ali, Andalib Ali
Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Orthopedics, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Jul 31;3:157. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.137870. eCollection 2014.
Femoral shaft fractures are among the most common fractures following high trauma injuries. Different kinds of treatment have been suggested for these injuries.
The aim of this study was to compare the results femoral fractures treated by mini open and close intramedullary nailing (IMN) technique.
A total of 48 adult patients were operated due to fracture of the femur with close or open IMN technique between September 2010 and September 2011. 23 patients operated with close. IMN technique was included in Group I while 24 patients operated with mini open IMN technique constituted Group II. In Group I, all patients. Were operated on the fracture table in the supine position while in Group II, all patients underwent surgery on standard tables in the lateral position.
The mean age of patients was 27.3 years, ranging between 16 and 62. The mean age of the close nailing and open nailing groups was 30.5 and 24.5 respectively (P = 0.052). Only one patient from the open nailing group failed to unite. The mean time for union in close and open nailing groups was 13 + 2.4 and 17.7 + 2.3 weeks respectively (P = 0.001). No infection or limb length discrepancies were observed in the two groups.
Although close nailing is the preferred methods in most cases, but in poly-traumatized patients or in centers where there are no fracture tables or C-arm, open nailing is a good option.
股骨干骨折是高能量创伤后最常见的骨折之一。针对这些损伤提出了不同的治疗方法。
本研究的目的是比较采用微创闭合和开放髓内钉固定(IMN)技术治疗股骨骨折的效果。
2010年9月至2011年9月期间,共有48例成年患者因股骨骨折接受了闭合或开放IMN技术手术。23例采用闭合IMN技术手术的患者纳入第一组,24例采用微创开放IMN技术手术的患者构成第二组。在第一组中,所有患者均在骨折手术台上仰卧位进行手术,而在第二组中,所有患者均在标准手术台上侧卧位接受手术。
患者的平均年龄为27.3岁,范围在16至62岁之间。闭合髓内钉固定组和开放髓内钉固定组的平均年龄分别为30.5岁和24.5岁(P = 0.052)。开放髓内钉固定组只有1例患者骨折未愈合。闭合和开放髓内钉固定组的平均愈合时间分别为13±2.4周和17.7±2.3周(P = 0.001)。两组均未观察到感染或肢体长度差异。
虽然在大多数情况下闭合髓内钉固定是首选方法,但在多发伤患者或没有骨折手术台或C型臂的中心,开放髓内钉固定是一个不错的选择。