Chen Innie, Lisonkova Sarka, Joseph K S, Williams Christina, Yong Paul, Allaire Catherine
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Sep;36(9):817-821. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30484-9.
To examine the relative frequency and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy compared with abdominal myomectomy in British Columbia.
A linked database containing hospital admission, operating room, and emergency room data from 2007 to 2011 from eight Vancouver Coastal Health and Providence Health Region hospitals in British Columbia was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of women who had myomectomy for uterine fibroids. All consecutive women who had abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy at five hospitals were included in the study. Patients who had submucosal fibroids or hysteroscopic procedures were excluded. Abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomies were contrasted in terms of patient characteristics and surgical outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed using t tests, Wilcoxon, chi-square, and Fisher exact test; a two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Of eight hospitals offering gynaecologic surgery, myomectomies were performed at five hospitals located in metropolitan areas. Of 436 women undergoing myomectomy, 88 cases (20.2%) were laparoscopic, 342 (78.4%) were abdominal, and 6 (1.38%) were laparoscopic with conversion to laparotomy. Women who had laparoscopic rather than abdominal myomectomies were slightly older (mean 38.7 vs. 37.4 years, respectively, P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in median operative time (106 vs. 95 min), but length of stay was decreased for laparoscopic myomectomies (median 1 vs. 2 days, P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed between laparoscopic and abdominal routes in the rates of admission to intensive care, prolonged hospitalization (> 3 days), or rehospitalization.
Myomectomies are performed in urban, metropolitan areas in British Columbia, and a significant fraction of myomectomies are performed by laparoscopy. Compared with abdominal myomectomies, laparoscopic myomectomies in pre-selected patients are associated with decreased length of stay and comparable perioperative surgical outcomes.
在不列颠哥伦比亚省,比较腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术的相对频率及手术结果。
利用一个关联数据库进行回顾性队列研究,该数据库包含2007年至2011年不列颠哥伦比亚省八个温哥华沿海卫生区和普罗维登斯健康区医院的住院、手术室及急诊室数据,研究对象为因子宫肌瘤接受子宫肌瘤切除术的女性。纳入了五家医院所有连续接受开腹或腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的女性。排除有黏膜下肌瘤或接受宫腔镜手术的患者。对比开腹和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的患者特征及手术结果。使用t检验、威尔科克森检验、卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验评估统计学显著性;双侧P值<0.05被视为具有显著性。
在提供妇科手术的八家医院中,子宫肌瘤切除术在位于大都市地区的五家医院进行。在436例行子宫肌瘤切除术的女性中,88例(20.2%)为腹腔镜手术,342例(78.4%)为开腹手术,6例(1.38%)为腹腔镜中转开腹手术。接受腹腔镜而非开腹子宫肌瘤切除术的女性年龄稍大(平均分别为38.7岁和37.4岁,P<0.05)。中位手术时间无显著差异(106分钟对95分钟),但腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术的住院时间缩短(中位时间1天对2天,P<0.01)。在重症监护病房入住率、延长住院时间(>3天)或再次住院率方面,腹腔镜和开腹手术途径之间未观察到显著差异。
不列颠哥伦比亚省的子宫肌瘤切除术在城市和大都市地区进行,相当一部分子宫肌瘤切除术通过腹腔镜进行。与开腹子宫肌瘤切除术相比,在预先选择的患者中,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术与住院时间缩短相关,围手术期手术结果相当。