Biran Noa, Ely Scott, Chari Ajai
John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, 92 Second Street, Suite 340, Hackensack, NJ, 07601, USA,
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2014 Dec;9(4):368-78. doi: 10.1007/s11899-014-0237-y.
Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has gained importance in the response evaluation of multiple myeloma. As discussed in part 1 of this two-part series, techniques such as multiparameter flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, and next-generation sequencing, of both bone marrow and peripheral blood, have the potential to achieve a high level of sensitivity, up to 1 in 10(-6) cells, enabling analysis of genetically diverse subclones. Here, we review the clinical utility of MRD assessment using these techniques. Specifically, we review the association between MRD-negativity and progression-free or overall survival in various clinical settings (post-induction, post-auto or allo-stem cell transplant, transplant ineligible, maintenance, and relapsed/refractory). Currently, the goal of assessing MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is to allow for a risk-stratified approach to therapy and for earlier identification of response to novel agents, particularly in the setting of clinical trials.
微小残留病(MRD)评估在多发性骨髓瘤的疗效评估中已变得愈发重要。正如在这个两部分系列的第1部分中所讨论的,对骨髓和外周血进行多参数流式细胞术、聚合酶链反应及新一代测序等技术,有潜力实现高达1/10⁻⁶细胞的高灵敏度,从而能够分析基因多样化的亚克隆。在此,我们回顾使用这些技术进行MRD评估的临床效用。具体而言,我们回顾在各种临床环境(诱导后、自体或异基因干细胞移植后、不符合移植条件、维持治疗以及复发/难治性)中MRD阴性与无进展生存期或总生存期之间的关联。目前,在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中评估MRD的目标是实现基于风险分层的治疗方法,并更早地确定对新型药物的反应,尤其是在临床试验背景下。