Stadler Tanja, Rabosky Daniel L, Ricklefs Robert E, Bokma Folmer
Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland.
Am Nat. 2014 Oct;184(4):447-55. doi: 10.1086/677676.
Many studies have tried to identify factors that explain differences in numbers of species between clades against the background assumption that older clades contain more species because they have had more time for diversity to accumulate. The finding in several recent studies that species richness of clades is decoupled from stem age has been interpreted as evidence for ecological limits to species richness. Here we demonstrate that the absence of a positive age-diversity relationship, or even a negative relationship, may also occur when taxa are defined based on time or some correlate of time such as genetic distance or perhaps morphological distinctness. Thus, inferring underlying processes from distributions of species across higher taxa requires caution concerning the way in which higher taxa are defined. When this definition is unclear, crown age is superior to stem age as a measure of clade age.
许多研究试图找出在这样一个背景假设下解释不同进化枝物种数量差异的因素,即较古老的进化枝包含更多物种,因为它们有更多时间让多样性得以积累。最近几项研究发现进化枝的物种丰富度与起源年龄脱钩,这一发现被解释为物种丰富度存在生态限制的证据。在这里,我们证明,当分类单元是基于时间或时间的某种相关因素(如遗传距离或形态差异)来定义时,也可能不存在正的年龄-多样性关系,甚至可能出现负相关关系。因此,从物种在更高级分类单元中的分布推断潜在过程时,需要谨慎考虑更高级分类单元的定义方式。当这种定义不明确时,冠龄作为进化枝年龄的衡量指标优于起源年龄。