Suppr超能文献

经皮介入治疗对阿拉吉耶综合征肺动脉狭窄的影响。

Impact of Percutaneous Interventions for Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Alagille Syndrome.

作者信息

Zussman Matthew, Hirsch Russel, Beekman Robert H, Goldstein Bryan H

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;10(4):310-6. doi: 10.1111/chd.12219. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to examine acute and midterm outcomes after percutaneous interventions for treatment of pulmonary artery stenosis (PAS) in patients with Alagille Syndrome (ALGS).

BACKGROUND

PAS affects up to two thirds of ALGS patients. Responsiveness to transcatheter therapies may differ from other causes of PAS. To date, there has been no study to evaluate outcomes of transcatheter interventions on PAS exclusively in ALGS.

METHODS

In this single-center series, we reviewed procedural, hemodynamic, and angiographic data from patients with ALGS and PAS from 2007 to 2011 who underwent an interventional catheterization. Minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was assessed pre- and postintervention, and at follow-up catheterization(s) when available. Acute and midterm response to high-pressure balloon angioplasty (HBA), bare metal stent (BMS) placement, and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine patients (median age 9.1 years) underwent 16 cardiac catheterizations with 34 interventions performed (20 HBA, 11 BMS, 3 CBA). There was a significant acute increase in MLD for all three modalities (42% HBA, P < .01; 91% BMS, P < .01; 58% CBA, P = .04). Follow-up data were available for 19 treated lesions at a median of 11 months. There was no significant difference in the improvement of MLD from baseline between the HBA and BMS groups, although in contrast to the BMS group, the HBA group showed continued interval vessel growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter intervention for PAS in ALGS is generally safe and acutely effective. Although BMS implantation was associated with the greatest immediate improvement in MLD, HBA-treated vessels demonstrate interval growth, whereas BMS-treated lesions do not.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨经皮介入治疗阿拉吉列综合征(ALGS)患者肺动脉狭窄(PAS)后的急性和中期结局。

背景

PAS影响多达三分之二的ALGS患者。经导管治疗的反应可能与其他PAS病因不同。迄今为止,尚无专门评估经导管介入治疗ALGS患者PAS结局的研究。

方法

在这个单中心系列研究中,我们回顾了2007年至2011年接受介入导管插入术的ALGS和PAS患者的手术、血流动力学和血管造影数据。在干预前后以及如有可用的随访导管插入术时评估最小管腔直径(MLD)。评估了对高压球囊血管成形术(HBA)、裸金属支架(BMS)置入和切割球囊血管成形术(CBA)的急性和中期反应。

结果

9名患者(中位年龄9.1岁)接受了16次心导管检查,共进行了34次干预(20次HBA、11次BMS、3次CBA)。所有三种方式的MLD均有显著急性增加(HBA为42%,P<0.01;BMS为91%,P<0.01;CBA为58%,P = 0.04)。共有19个治疗病变的随访数据可用,中位随访时间为11个月。HBA组和BMS组之间MLD从基线的改善无显著差异,尽管与BMS组相比,HBA组显示血管有持续的间隔期生长。

结论

经导管介入治疗ALGS患者的PAS一般安全且急性有效。虽然BMS植入与MLD的最大即时改善相关,但HBA治疗的血管显示有间隔期生长,而BMS治疗的病变则没有。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验