Capik Canturk, Gozum Sebahat
Nursing Department, Ataturk University Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzurum, Turkey.
Public Health Nurs. 2015 Jan-Feb;32(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/phn.12156. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
To assess the psychometric properties of a Likert-formatted assessment instrument after altering the responses to a dichotomous format.
This methodological study used a 15-item instrument to obtain data from 183 participants who responded in both Likert and dichotomous formats. Response sets from each format were compared.
Each response set underwent factor analysis, Kuder-Richardson 20, Cronbach's α coefficient, item-total correlation, and parallel form equivalence tests.
Factor loads of the instrument varied between .362 and .754 when responses were Likert-formatted and between .370 and .713 when responses were dichotomous. The Cronbach's α coefficient with Likert-formatted responses was .858; the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient of the dichotomous responses was .827. Parallel form equivalences were significant at the level of r = .753.
The instrument had valid results when either Likert or dichotomous responses were obtained.
在将李克特式评估工具的回答改为二分格式后,评估该工具的心理测量特性。
本方法学研究使用一份包含15个条目的工具,从183名以李克特式和二分格式作答的参与者那里获取数据。对每种格式的回答集进行了比较。
对每个回答集进行了因子分析、库德-理查森20系数、克朗巴哈α系数、项目-总分相关性和平行形式等效性测试。
当回答为李克特式格式时,该工具的因子载荷在0.362至0.754之间;当回答为二分格式时,因子载荷在0.370至0.713之间。李克特式回答的克朗巴哈α系数为0.858;二分回答的库德-理查森20系数为0.827。平行形式等效性在r = 0.753水平上显著。
当获得李克特式或二分回答时,该工具都有有效的结果。