Suppr超能文献

免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。

Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).

机构信息

Registro Tumori del Veneto, Padova, Italy.

CPO Piemonte and San Giovanni Battista University Hospital, Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess variation in the main colonoscopy quality indicators in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes based on faecal immunochemical test (FIT).

DESIGN

Data from a case-series of colonoscopies of FIT-positive subjects were provided by 44 Italian CRC screening programmes. Data on screening history, endoscopic procedure and histology results, and additional information on the endoscopy centre and the endoscopists were collected. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) and caecal intubation rate (CIR) were assessed for the whole population and the individual endoscopists. To explore variation in the quality indicators, multilevel analyses were performed according to patient/centre/endoscopist characteristics.

RESULTS

We analysed 75 569 (mean age: 61.3 years; men: 57%) colonoscopies for positive FIT performed by 479 endoscopists in 79 centres. ADR ranged from 13.5% to 75% among endoscopists (mean: 44.8%). ADR was associated with gastroenterology specialty (OR: 0.87 for others, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.96) and, at the endoscopy centre level, with the routine use of sedation (OR: 0.80 if occasional (<33%); 95% CI 0.64 to 1.00) and availability of screening-dedicated sessions (OR: 1.35; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.66). CIR ranged between 58.8% and 100% (mean: 93.1%). Independent predictors of CIR at the endoscopist level were the yearly number of screening colonoscopies performed (OR: 1.51 for endoscopists with >600 colonoscopies; 95% CI 1.11 to 2.04) and, at the endoscopy centre level, screening-dedicated sessions (OR: 2.18; 95% CI 1.24 to 3.83) and higher rates of sedation (OR: 0.47 if occasional; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of colonoscopy was affected by patient-related, endoscopist-related and centre-related characteristics. Policies addressing organisational issues should improve the quality of colonoscopy in our programme and similar programmes.

摘要

目的

根据粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)评估基于组织结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划的主要结肠镜检查质量指标的变化。

设计

44 个意大利 CRC 筛查计划提供了 FIT 阳性受试者系列病例结肠镜检查的数据。收集了筛查史、内镜程序和组织学结果以及内镜中心和内镜医生的其他信息。评估了整个人群和个别内镜医生的腺瘤检出率(ADR)和盲肠插管率(CIR)。根据患者/中心/内镜医生的特征进行了多层次分析,以探讨质量指标的变化。

结果

我们分析了 479 名内镜医生在 79 个中心对 75569 例(平均年龄:61.3 岁;男性:57%)FIT 阳性结肠镜检查。内镜医生的 ADR 范围为 13.5%至 75%(平均:44.8%)。ADR 与胃肠病学专业(OR:0.87 为其他专业,95%CI 0.76 至 0.96)和内镜中心水平的镇静常规使用(OR:偶尔使用(<33%)为 0.80;95%CI 0.64 至 1.00)和提供专门的筛查会议(OR:1.35;95%CI 1.11 至 1.66)有关。CIR 范围为 58.8%至 100%(平均:93.1%)。内镜医生水平上 CIR 的独立预测因素是每年进行的筛查结肠镜检查次数(OR:600 例以上的内镜医生为 1.51;95%CI 1.11 至 2.04)和内镜中心水平上专门的筛查会议(OR:2.18;95%CI 1.24 至 3.83)和更高的镇静率(OR:偶尔使用为 0.47;95%CI 0.24 至 0.92)。

结论

结肠镜检查的质量受到患者相关、内镜医生相关和中心相关特征的影响。解决组织问题的政策应提高我们计划和类似计划中结肠镜检查的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验