Yun Dae Young, Han Jimin, Oh Jang Seok, Park Keun Woo, Shin Im Hee, Kim Ho Gak
Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Gut Liver. 2014 Sep;8(5):552-6. doi: 10.5009/gnl13310. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This case-control study evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients 90 years of age and older.
From January 2005 to August 2011, 5,070 cases of ERCP were performed at our institution. Of these, 43 cases involved patients 90 years of age and older (mean age, 91.7±1.9 years). A control group of 129 cases (mean age, 65.7±14.8 years) was matched by the patient sex, sphincterotomy, and presence of choledocholithiasis using a propensity score. The patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed for comorbidity, periampullary diverticulum, urgent procedure, conscious sedation, technical success, procedure duration, ERCP-related complication, and death.
Between the case and control groups, there was no significant difference with regard to comorbidity, periampullary diverticulum, and urgent procedure. Conscious sedation was performed significantly less in the patient group versus the control group (28 [65%] vs 119 [92%], respectively; p=0.000). There was no significant difference in the technical success, procedure duration, or ERCP-related complications. In both groups, there was no major bleeding or perforation related to ERCP. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred significantly less in the patient group compared to the control group (0 vs 13 [10%], respectively; p=0.004). One death occurred from respiratory arrest in the case group.
ERCP can be performed safely and successfully in patients aged 90 years and older without any significant increase in complications.
背景/目的:本病例对照研究评估了90岁及以上患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的安全性和有效性。
2005年1月至2011年8月,我院共进行了5070例ERCP手术。其中,43例患者年龄在90岁及以上(平均年龄91.7±1.9岁)。采用倾向评分法,按照患者性别、括约肌切开术及胆总管结石情况,匹配了129例对照组患者(平均年龄65.7±14.8岁)。回顾性分析患者病历,记录合并症、壶腹周围憩室、急诊手术、清醒镇静、技术成功率、手术时长、ERCP相关并发症及死亡情况。
病例组与对照组在合并症、壶腹周围憩室及急诊手术方面无显著差异。患者组清醒镇静的实施率显著低于对照组(分别为28例[65%]和119例[92%];p = 0.000)。技术成功率、手术时长或ERCP相关并发症方面无显著差异。两组均未发生与ERCP相关的大出血或穿孔。与对照组相比,患者组ERCP术后胰腺炎的发生率显著更低(分别为0例和13例[10%];p = 0.004)。病例组有1例因呼吸骤停死亡。
90岁及以上患者行ERCP可安全、成功进行,且并发症无显著增加。