Regina-Silva Shara, Fortes-Dias Consuelo Latorre, Michalsky Érika Monteiro, França-Silva João Carlos, Quaresma Patrícia Flávia, da Rocha Lima Ana Cristina Vianna Mariano, Teixeira-Neto Rafael Gonçalves, Dias Edelberto Santos
Laboratório de Leishmanioses, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, BRAZIL.
Diretoria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Belo Horizonte, MG, BRAZIL.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014 Jul;47(4):462-8. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0064-2014.
Dogs play a primary role in the zoonotic cycle of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Therefore, the accurate diagnosis of infected dogs, primarily asymptomatic dogs, is crucial to the efficiency of VL control programs.
We investigated the agreement of four diagnostic tests for canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL): parasite detection, either after myeloculture or by direct microscopic examination of tissue imprints; kinetoplast-deoxyribonucleic acid-polymerase chain reaction (kDNA-PCR); and an immunochromatographic test (ICT). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and an indirect immunofluorescence test (IFAT), both of which were adopted as part of the screening-culling program in Brazil, were used as reference tests. Our sample set consisted of 44 seropositive dogs, 25 of which were clinically asymptomatic and 19 were symptomatic for CVL according to ELISA-IFAT.
The highest and lowest test co-positivities were observed for ICT (77.3%) and myeloculture (58.1%), respectively. When analyzed together, the overall percentage of co-positive tests was significantly higher for the symptomatic group compared to the asymptomatic group. However, only ICT was significantly different based on the results of a separate analysis per test for each group of dogs. The majority (93.8%) of animals exhibited at least one positive test result, with an average of 2.66 positive tests per dog. Half of the symptomatic dogs tested positive for all four tests administered.
The variability between test results reinforces the need for more efficient and reliable methods to accurately diagnose canine VL, particularly in asymptomatic animals.
狗在内脏利什曼病(VL)的人畜共患病传播循环中起主要作用。因此,准确诊断受感染的狗,尤其是无症状的狗,对于VL控制计划的有效性至关重要。
我们调查了四种犬内脏利什曼病(CVL)诊断测试的一致性:寄生虫检测,通过骨髓培养或组织印片直接显微镜检查;动质体脱氧核糖核酸聚合酶链反应(kDNA-PCR);以及免疫层析试验(ICT)。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和间接免疫荧光试验(IFAT)均被用作巴西筛查-扑杀计划的一部分,作为参考测试。我们的样本集包括44只血清阳性犬,其中25只临床上无症状,19只根据ELISA-IFAT有CVL症状。
ICT的测试共同阳性率最高(77.3%),骨髓培养的共同阳性率最低(58.1%)。综合分析时,有症状组的测试共同阳性总体百分比显著高于无症状组。然而,根据对每组狗的每项测试单独分析的结果,只有ICT有显著差异。大多数(93.8%)动物至少有一项阳性测试结果,每只狗平均有2.66项阳性测试。一半有症状的狗对所有四项测试均呈阳性。
测试结果之间的差异强化了对更有效、可靠方法的需求,以准确诊断犬VL,尤其是在无症状动物中。