Jensen Natasja Koitzsch, Johansen Katrine Schepelern, Kastrup Marianne, Krasnik Allan, Norredam Marie
The Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health (MESU), Section for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, Copenhagen University, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen 1014, Denmark.
KORA, The Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Købmagergade 22, Copenhagen 1150, Denmark.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 17;11(9):9739-59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110909739.
The purpose of this study was to investigate continuity of care in the psychiatric healthcare system from the perspective of patients, including vulnerable groups such as immigrants and refugees.
The study is based on 19 narrative interviews conducted with 15 patients with diverse migration backgrounds (immigrants, descendents, refugees, and ethnic Danes). Patients were recruited from a community psychiatric centre situated in an area with a high proportion of immigrants and refugees. Data were analysed through the lens of a theoretical framework of continuity of care in psychiatry, developed in 2004 by Joyce et al., which encompasses four domains: accessibility, individualised care, relationship base and service delivery.
Investigating continuity of care, we found issues of specific concern to immigrants and refugees, but also commonalities across the groups. For accessibility, areas pertinent to immigrants and refugees include lack of knowledge concerning mental illness and obligations towards children. In terms of individualised care, trauma, additional vulnerability, and taboo concerning mental illness were of specific concern. In the domain of service delivery, social services included assistance with immigration papers for immigrants and refugees. In the relationship base domain, no differences were identified. Implications for priority area: The treatment courses of patients in the psychiatric field are complex and diverse and the patient perspective of continuity of care provides important insight into the delivery of care. The study highlights the importance of person-centred care irrespective of migration background though it may be beneficial to have an awareness of areas that may be of more specific concern to immigrants and refugees.
The study sheds light on concerns specific to immigrants and refugees in a framework of continuity of care, but also commonalities across the patient groups.
本研究旨在从患者角度,包括移民和难民等弱势群体的角度,调查精神卫生保健系统中的连续性护理情况。
该研究基于对15名具有不同移民背景(移民、后裔、难民和丹麦族裔)的患者进行的19次叙事访谈。患者是从一个位于移民和难民比例较高地区的社区精神卫生中心招募的。数据通过2004年乔伊斯等人开发的精神科连续性护理理论框架进行分析,该框架涵盖四个领域:可及性、个性化护理、关系基础和服务提供。
在调查连续性护理时,我们发现了移民和难民特别关注的问题,也发现了各群体之间的共性。在可及性方面,与移民和难民相关的领域包括对精神疾病的知识缺乏以及对儿童的义务。在个性化护理方面,创伤、额外的脆弱性以及对精神疾病的禁忌是特别关注的问题。在服务提供领域,社会服务包括为移民和难民提供移民文件方面的协助。在关系基础领域,未发现差异。对优先领域的启示:精神科领域患者的治疗过程复杂多样,患者对连续性护理的看法为护理提供提供了重要见解。该研究强调了以人为本护理的重要性,无论移民背景如何,尽管了解移民和难民可能更特别关注的领域可能会有所帮助。
该研究揭示了在连续性护理框架下移民和难民特有的问题,以及患者群体之间的共性。