Tullos Desirée D, Finn Debra S, Walter Cara
Water Resources Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 18;9(9):e108091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108091. eCollection 2014.
Dams are known to impact river channels and ecosystems, both during their lifetime and in their decommissioning. In this study, we applied a before-after-control-impact design associated with two small dam removals to investigate abiotic and biotic recovery trajectories from both the elimination of the press disturbance associated with the presence of dams and the introduction of a pulse disturbance associated with removal of dams. The two case studies represent different geomorphic and ecological conditions that we expected to represent low and high sensitivities to the pulse disturbance of dam removal: the 4 m tall, gravel-filled Brownsville Dam on the wadeable Calapooia River and the 12.5 m tall, sand and gravel-filled Savage Rapids Dam on the largely non-wadeable Rogue River. We evaluated both geomorphic and ecological responses annually for two years post removal, and asked if functional traits of the macroinvertebrate assemblages provided more persistent signals of ecological disturbance than taxonomically defined assemblages over the period of study. Results indicate that: 1) the presence of the dams constituted a strong ecological press disturbance to the near-downstream reaches on both rivers, despite the fact that both rivers passed unregulated flow and sediment during the high flow season; 2) ecological recovery from this press disturbance occurred within the year following the restoration action of dam removal, whereas signals of geomorphic disturbance from the pulse of released sediment persisted two years post-removal, and 3) the strength of the press disturbance and the rapid ecological recovery were detected regardless of whether recovery was assessed by taxonomic or functional assemblages and for both case studies, in spite of their different geomorphic settings.
众所周知,水坝在其运行期间及其退役过程中都会对河道和生态系统产生影响。在本研究中,我们采用了一种前后对照影响设计,并结合两座小型水坝的拆除,以调查从消除与水坝存在相关的压力干扰以及引入与水坝拆除相关的脉冲干扰后,非生物和生物的恢复轨迹。这两个案例研究代表了不同的地貌和生态条件,我们预计它们对水坝拆除的脉冲干扰表现出低敏感性和高敏感性:位于可涉水的卡拉波奥伊河上高4米、填充砾石的布朗斯维尔水坝,以及位于基本上不可涉水的罗格河上高12.5米、填充砂石的萨维奇急流水坝。在拆除后的两年里,我们每年评估地貌和生态响应,并询问在研究期间,大型无脊椎动物群落的功能特征是否比分类定义的群落提供了更持久的生态干扰信号。结果表明:1)尽管两条河流在高流量季节都经历了无管制的水流和泥沙,但水坝的存在对两条河流下游附近区域构成了强烈的生态压力干扰;2)在拆除水坝的恢复行动后的一年内,从这种压力干扰中实现了生态恢复,而释放泥沙脉冲造成的地貌干扰信号在拆除后持续了两年;3)无论通过分类或功能群落评估恢复情况,以及对于两个案例研究,尽管它们的地貌环境不同,但都检测到了压力干扰的强度和快速的生态恢复。