Mantovani Edoardo, Arduino Paolo Giacomo, Schierano Gianmario, Ferrero Luca, Gallesio Giorgia, Mozzati Marco, Russo Andrea, Scully Crispian, Carossa Stefano
Clinician, Oral Surgery Unit, CIR-Dental School, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Researcher, Oral Medicine Unit, CIR-Dental School, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.
The surgical removal of mandibular third molars is frequently accompanied by significant postsurgical sequelae, and different protocols have been described to decrease such adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional rotating instruments during mandibular third molar removal.
A single-center, randomized, split-mouth study was performed using a consecutive series of unrelated healthy patients attending the Oral Surgery Unit of the University of Turin for surgical removal of bilateral mandibular third molar teeth. Each patient was treated, at the same appointment, using bur removal on 1 side of the mandible and a piezoelectric device on the contralateral side. The primary outcomes reported were postoperative pain, objective orofacial swelling, and surgical duration; secondary outcomes were gender, age, and possible adverse events. Analysis of variance or paired t test was used as appropriate to test any significant differences at baseline according to each treatment subgroup, and categorical variables were analyzed by χ(2) test.
The study sample consisted of 100 otherwise healthy patients. The mean pain evaluation reported by patients who underwent surgery with piezosurgery was significantly lower than that reported after bur (conventional) removal, reaching statistical difference after 4 days (P = .043). The clinical value of orofacial swelling at day 7, normalized to baseline, was lower in the piezosurgery group (P < .005). The average surgical duration was significantly shorter in the bur group than in the piezosurgery group (P < .05). Three patients having bur removal developed short-term complications (2 dry sockets and 1 temporary paraesthesia), which totally resolved by 4 weeks.
To date, this prospective investigation is the largest reported split-mouth study on piezosurgery for lower third molar tooth removal. This study also compared surgeons with different degrees of experience. It is evident that using a piezoelectric device can enhance the patient experience and decrease postoperative pain and swelling.
下颌第三磨牙的手术拔除常常伴有明显的术后后遗症,并且已经描述了不同的方案来减少此类不良事件。本研究的目的是调查在下颌第三磨牙拔除过程中,压电手术与传统旋转器械相比的性能。
采用单中心、随机、双侧对照研究,连续纳入都灵大学口腔外科接受双侧下颌第三磨牙手术拔除的无亲属关系的健康患者。每位患者在同一次就诊时,一侧下颌使用牙钻拔除,对侧使用压电装置。报告的主要结局为术后疼痛、客观的口面部肿胀和手术时间;次要结局为性别、年龄和可能的不良事件。根据每个治疗亚组,酌情使用方差分析或配对t检验来检验基线时的任何显著差异,分类变量采用χ(2)检验进行分析。
研究样本包括100名其他方面健康的患者。接受压电手术的患者报告的平均疼痛评估显著低于牙钻(传统)拔除后的报告值,在4天后达到统计学差异(P = .043)。压电手术组在第7天经基线校正后的口面部肿胀临床值较低(P < .005)。牙钻组的平均手术时间明显短于压电手术组(P < .05)。3例接受牙钻拔除的患者出现短期并发症(2例干槽症和1例暂时性感觉异常),4周时完全缓解。
迄今为止,这项前瞻性研究是报道的关于下颌第三磨牙拔除的压电手术的最大规模双侧对照研究。本研究还比较了不同经验程度的外科医生。显然,使用压电装置可以改善患者体验并减少术后疼痛和肿胀。