Suppr超能文献

医院间结肠癌切除术治疗效果的差异:死亡率、再入院率和费用。

A variation in the value of colectomy for cancer across hospitals: mortality, readmissions, and costs.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.

Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

出版信息

Surgery. 2014 Oct;156(4):849-56, 860. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.011.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although hospital variation in costs and outcomes has been described for patients undergoing operation, the relationship between them is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this relationship among patients undergoing colon resection for cancer and identify characteristics of "high-quality, low-cost" hospitals.

METHODS

We identified adult patients who underwent colon resection for cancer in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 to 2010. We estimated hospital-level, risk-standardized 30-day hospital costs, in-hospital mortality rates, and 30-day readmission rates by using hierarchical generalized linear models. Costs were compared between hospitals identified as low, average, and high performers.

RESULTS

The final sample included 14,790 patients discharged from 389 hospitals. After adjusting for case mix, variation was noted in risk-standardized costs (median = $26,169, inter-quartile range [IQR] = $6,559), in-hospital mortality (median = 1.8%, IQR = 2.3%), and 30-day readmission (12.2%, IQR = 0.7%) rates. Minimal correlation was noted between a hospital's costs and outcomes, with similar costs noted across hospital performance groups (low = $25,994 vs average = $26,998 vs high = $25,794, P = .19). High-quality, low-cost hospitals treated a greater percentage of Medicare beneficiaries, approached fewer cases laparoscopically, and trended toward greater volume.

CONCLUSION

Hospital costs are not correlated with outcomes in this population. More work is needed to identify means of providing high-quality care at lesser costs.

摘要

简介

尽管已经描述了接受手术的患者在医院间的成本和结果的差异,但两者之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估接受结肠癌切除术的患者之间的这种关系,并确定“高质量、低成本”医院的特征。

方法

我们从 2009 年至 2010 年确定了在加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约接受结肠癌切除术的成年患者。我们使用分层广义线性模型来估计医院层面的 30 天风险标准化住院费用、住院死亡率和 30 天再入院率。将成本与被确定为低、中、高绩效的医院进行比较。

结果

最终样本包括 389 家医院出院的 14790 名患者。在调整病例组合后,风险标准化成本(中位数为 26169 美元,四分位距 [IQR] 为 6559 美元)、住院死亡率(中位数为 1.8%,IQR 为 2.3%)和 30 天再入院率(12.2%,IQR 为 0.7%)存在差异。医院的成本和结果之间相关性极小,在医院绩效组中观察到相似的成本(低=25994 美元与平均=26998 美元与高=25794 美元,P=0.19)。高质量、低成本的医院治疗更多的医疗保险受益人的比例,接近更少的病例腹腔镜下,并倾向于更大的量。

结论

在本人群中,医院的成本与结果没有相关性。需要做更多的工作来确定以较低成本提供高质量护理的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验