Liljeqvist Henning T G, Muscatello David, Sara Grant, Dinh Michael, Lawrence Glenda L
NSW Public Health Officer Training Program, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Sep 23;14:84. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-84.
Syndromic surveillance in emergency departments (EDs) may be used to deliver early warnings of increases in disease activity, to provide situational awareness during events of public health significance, to supplement other information on trends in acute disease and injury, and to support the development and monitoring of prevention or response strategies. Changes in mental health related ED presentations may be relevant to these goals, provided they can be identified accurately and efficiently. This study aimed to measure the accuracy of using diagnostic codes in electronic ED presentation records to identify mental health-related visits.
We selected a random sample of 500 records from a total of 1,815,588 ED electronic presentation records from 59 NSW public hospitals during 2010. ED diagnoses were recorded using any of ICD-9, ICD-10 or SNOMED CT classifications. Three clinicians, blinded to the automatically generated syndromic grouping and each other's classification, reviewed the triage notes and classified each of the 500 visits as mental health-related or not. A "mental health problem presentation" for the purposes of this study was defined as any ED presentation where either a mental disorder or a mental health problem was the reason for the ED visit. The combined clinicians' assessment of the records was used as reference standard to measure the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the automatic classification of coded emergency department diagnoses. Agreement between the reference standard and the automated coded classification was estimated using the Kappa statistic.
Agreement between clinician's classification and automated coded classification was substantial (Kappa = 0.73. 95% CI: 0.58 - 0.87). The automatic syndromic grouping of coded ED diagnoses for mental health-related visits was found to be moderately sensitive (68% 95% CI: 46%-84%) and highly specific at 99% (95% CI: 98%-99.7%) when compared with the reference standard in identifying mental health related ED visits. Positive predictive value was 81% (95% CI: 0.57 - 0.94) and negative predictive value was 98% (95% CI: 0.97-0.99).
Mental health presentations identified using diagnoses coded with various classifications in electronic ED presentation records offers sufficient accuracy for application in near real-time syndromic surveillance.
急诊科的症状监测可用于对疾病活动增加发出早期预警,在具有公共卫生意义的事件期间提供态势感知,补充有关急性疾病和损伤趋势的其他信息,并支持预防或应对策略的制定和监测。与心理健康相关的急诊科就诊情况的变化可能与这些目标相关,前提是能够准确有效地识别这些变化。本研究旨在衡量使用电子急诊科就诊记录中的诊断代码来识别与心理健康相关就诊的准确性。
我们从2010年新南威尔士州59家公立医院的1815588份急诊科电子就诊记录中随机抽取了500份记录样本。急诊科诊断使用国际疾病分类第9版(ICD - 9)、国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)或医学系统命名法临床术语(SNOMED CT)分类中的任何一种进行记录。三位临床医生在不知道自动生成的症状分组以及彼此分类的情况下,审查了分诊记录,并将500次就诊中的每一次分类为是否与心理健康相关。本研究中“心理健康问题就诊”的定义为任何因精神障碍或心理健康问题而到急诊科就诊的情况。将临床医生对记录的综合评估用作参考标准,以衡量编码后的急诊科诊断自动分类的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。使用卡方统计量估计参考标准与自动编码分类之间的一致性。
临床医生分类与自动编码分类之间的一致性较高(卡方 = 0.73,95%置信区间:0.58 - 0.87)。与识别与心理健康相关的急诊科就诊的参考标准相比,发现编码后的急诊科诊断对与心理健康相关就诊的自动症状分组具有中等敏感性(68%,95%置信区间:46% - 84%)和99%的高特异性(95%置信区间:98% - 99.7%)。阳性预测值为81%(95%置信区间:0.57 - 0.94),阴性预测值为98%(95%置信区间:0.97 - 0.99)。
在电子急诊科就诊记录中使用各种分类编码的诊断来识别心理健康就诊情况,对于近实时症状监测的应用具有足够的准确性。