Bryczkowski Sarah B, Lopreiato Maeve C, Yonclas Peter P, Sacca James J, Mosenthal Anne C
From the Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Dec;77(6):944-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000427.
Adults (age > 50 years) admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) are at high risk for delirium. Little is known about the role traumatic injury plays in the development of delirium because these patients have often been excluded from studies. Identification of specific risk factors for delirium among older adults following injury would be useful to guide prevention strategies. We attempted to identify modifiable factors that would predict delirium in an older trauma population admitted to the SICU.
Data were collected prospectively from July 2012 to August 2013 at a Level I trauma center on consecutive trauma patients, older than 50 years, admitted to the SICU. Patients who died in the SICU were excluded. Delirium was assessed every 12 hours using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU scale. Demographic, injury, social, and clinical variables were reviewed. Bivariate analysis determined significant factors associated with delirium. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to predict delirium risk. After preliminary results, additional analysis compared patients with chest injury (defined as chest Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 3) with those without.
A total of 115 patients met criteria, with a mean age of 67 years, Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 19, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14. The incidence of delirium was 61%. Variables present on admission, which were positive predictors of delirium, were as follows: age, ISS greater than 17, GCS score less than 15, substance abuse, and traumatic brain injury (defined as head AIS score ≥ 3). Chest injury (defined as chest AIS score ≥ 3) was a negative predictor of delirium. Significant risk factors influenced by clinical treatment included doses of opioids and propofol, restraint use, and hours deeply sedated (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] score ≤ -3). Clinical treatments with negative predictability were ventilator-free days/30 (vent-free), benzodiazepine-free days/30 (benzo-free), and restraint-free days/30. In a regression model considering age, vent-free days, chest injury, traumatic brain injury, GCS score, benzo-free days, and hours sedated, only age (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.1; p = 0.03) was a predictor of delirium, while vent-free days (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.96; p = 0.02) and chest injury (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.09-0.83; p = 0.02) were significant negative predictors of delirium. Patients with chest injury had lower delirium incidence (44%) versus those without (75%) (p = 0.002) despite similar GCS score, ISS, and clinical variables.
Delirium is common in older trauma patients admitted to the SICU, and for every year for those older than 50 years, the chance of delirium increases by 10%. While higher ISS increases delirium risk, we identified several modifiable treatment variables including days patients were deeply sedated, mechanically ventilated, and physically restrained. Interestingly, patients with chest injury experienced less delirium, despite similar injury severity and clinical variables, perhaps owing to frequent health care provider interactions.
Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.
入住外科重症监护病房(SICU)的成年人(年龄>50岁)发生谵妄的风险很高。由于这些患者常常被排除在研究之外,关于创伤性损伤在谵妄发生过程中所起的作用知之甚少。识别受伤老年患者发生谵妄的特定风险因素将有助于指导预防策略。我们试图识别可改变的因素,以预测入住SICU的老年创伤患者发生谵妄的情况。
2012年7月至2013年8月,在一家一级创伤中心前瞻性收集连续入住SICU的年龄大于50岁的创伤患者的数据。排除在SICU死亡的患者。使用ICU意识模糊评估方法量表每12小时评估一次谵妄情况。对人口统计学、损伤、社会和临床变量进行审查。双变量分析确定与谵妄相关的显著因素。使用多变量逻辑回归模型预测谵妄风险。在初步结果出来后,进一步分析比较了胸部损伤患者(定义为胸部简明损伤定级标准[AIS]评分≥3)和无胸部损伤患者。
共有115例患者符合标准,平均年龄67岁,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为19,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为14。谵妄发生率为61%。入院时存在的变量,即谵妄的阳性预测因素如下:年龄、ISS大于17、GCS评分小于15、药物滥用和创伤性脑损伤(定义为头部AIS评分≥3)。胸部损伤(定义为胸部AIS评分≥3)是谵妄的阴性预测因素。受临床治疗影响的显著风险因素包括阿片类药物和丙泊酚的剂量、约束使用情况以及深度镇静时间(里士满躁动镇静量表[RASS]评分≤-3)。具有负预测性的临床治疗指标为无呼吸机天数/30(无呼吸机)、无苯二氮䓬类药物天数/30(无苯二氮䓬类药物)和无约束天数/30。在一个考虑年龄、无呼吸机天数、胸部损伤、创伤性脑损伤、GCS评分、无苯二氮䓬类药物天数和镇静时间的回归模型中,只有年龄(比值比[OR],1.1;95%置信区间[CI],1.01 - 1.1;p = 0.03)是谵妄的预测因素,而无呼吸机天数(OR,0.79;95% CI,0.65 - 0.96;p = 0.02)和胸部损伤(OR,0.3;95% CI,0.09 - 0.83;p = 0.02)是谵妄的显著负预测因素。尽管GCS评分、ISS和临床变量相似,但胸部损伤患者的谵妄发生率(44%)低于无胸部损伤患者(75%)(p = 0.002)。
谵妄在入住SICU的老年创伤患者中很常见,对于50岁以上的患者,每增加一岁,发生谵妄的几率就增加10%。虽然较高的ISS会增加谵妄风险,但我们识别出了几个可改变的治疗变量,包括患者深度镇静、机械通气和身体约束的天数。有趣的是,尽管损伤严重程度和临床变量相似,但胸部损伤患者的谵妄发生率较低,这可能是由于医护人员频繁接触所致。
预后/流行病学研究,III级。