Saruta Takao, Ogihara Toshio, Saito Ikuo, Rakugi Hiromi, Shimamoto Kazuaki, Matsuoka Hiroaki, Teramukai Satoshi, Higaki Jitsuo, Ito Sadayoshi, Shimada Kazuyuki
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Morinomiya University of Medical Sciences, Osaka, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2015 Feb;38(2):132-6. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.141. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
The cardiovascular effects of combined therapy with the angiotensin receptor blocker (olmesartan) and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a diuretic were compared in high-risk elderly Japanese hypertensive patients by performing a randomized, open label, blinded-endpoint study of morbidity and mortality (the COLM study). Here we report the results obtained with respect to safety and tolerability. High-risk hypertensive patients aged 65-84 years were enrolled and were randomized to receive olmesartan combined with either a CCB (amlodipine or azelnidipine) or a low-dose diuretic for at least 3 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non fatal cardiovascular events, whereas adverse events (AEs) and the percentage of patients who discontinued the allocated treatment were evaluated as secondary endpoints. A total of 5141 patients were randomized. Both combination regimens achieved a similar reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The incidences of AEs, serious AEs, drug-related serious AEs and discontinuation due to serious AEs were lower in the olmesartan plus CCB group than in the olmesartan plus diuretic group. Serum levels of uric acid and creatinine were significantly higher in the olmesartan plus diuretic group than in the olmesartan plus CCB group. Olmesartan combined with a CCB was significantly superior to olmesartan plus a diuretic with regard to the frequency of AEs and discontinuation of treatment.
通过开展一项关于发病率和死亡率的随机、开放标签、终点盲法研究(COLM研究),比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(奥美沙坦)与二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或利尿剂联合治疗对高危老年日本高血压患者的心血管影响。在此,我们报告关于安全性和耐受性的研究结果。纳入了65 - 84岁的高危高血压患者,并将其随机分组,接受奥美沙坦联合CCB(氨氯地平或阿折地平)或低剂量利尿剂治疗至少3年。主要终点是致命和非致命心血管事件的复合终点,而不良事件(AE)以及停止分配治疗的患者百分比被评估为次要终点。共有5141名患者被随机分组。两种联合治疗方案在降低心血管发病率和死亡率方面效果相似。奥美沙坦加CCB组的AE、严重AE、药物相关严重AE以及因严重AE而停药的发生率低于奥美沙坦加利尿剂组。奥美沙坦加利尿剂组的尿酸和肌酐血清水平显著高于奥美沙坦加CCB组。在AE发生频率和治疗中断方面,奥美沙坦联合CCB显著优于奥美沙坦加利尿剂。