Corluka Adrijana, Hyder Adnan A, Winch Peter J, Segura Elsa
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA and National Institute of Parasitology, "Dr. M. Fatala Chabén", Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS), Ministerio de Salud, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA and National Institute of Parasitology, "Dr. M. Fatala Chabén", Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud (ANLIS), Ministerio de Salud, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu071.
Much of the published research on evidence-informed health policymaking in low- and middle-income countries has focused on policymakers, overlooking the role of health researchers in the research-to-policy process. Through 20 semi-structured, in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with researchers in Argentina's rural northwest and the capital of Buenos Aires, we explore the perspectives, experiences and attitudes of Argentine health researchers regarding the use and impact of health research in policymaking in Argentina. We find that the researcher, and the researcher's function of generating evidence, is nested within a broader complex system that influences the researcher's interaction with policymaking. This system comprises communities of practice, government departments/civil society organizations, bureaucratic processes and political governance and executive leadership. At the individual level, researcher capacity and determinants of research availability also play a role in contributing to evidence-informed policymaking. In addition, we find a recurrent theme around 'lack of trust' and explore the role of trust within a research system, finding that researchers' distrust towards policymakers and even other researchers are linked inextricably to the sociopolitical history of Argentina, which contributes to shaping researchers' identities in opposition to policymakers. For policymakers, national research councils and funders of national health research systems, this article provides a deeper understanding of researchers' perceptions which can help inform and improve programme design when developing interventions to enhance research utilization and develop equitable and rational health policies. For donors and development agencies interested in health research capacity building and achieving development goals, this research demonstrates a need for investment in building research capacity and training health researchers to interact with the public policy 'world' and enhancing research communications and transferability to decision makers. It also highlights an opportunity to invest in implementation research platforms, such as health policy research and analysis institutions.
许多关于低收入和中等收入国家循证卫生政策制定的已发表研究都聚焦于政策制定者,而忽视了卫生研究人员在研究到政策过程中的作用。通过对阿根廷西北部农村地区和布宜诺斯艾利斯市的研究人员进行20次半结构化、深入的定性访谈,我们探讨了阿根廷卫生研究人员对卫生研究在阿根廷政策制定中的应用和影响的看法、经历和态度。我们发现,研究人员及其产生证据的功能嵌套在一个更广泛的复杂系统中,该系统影响着研究人员与政策制定的互动。这个系统包括实践社区、政府部门/民间社会组织、官僚程序以及政治治理和行政领导。在个人层面,研究人员的能力和研究可得性的决定因素在促进循证政策制定方面也发挥着作用。此外,我们发现了一个围绕“缺乏信任”的反复出现的主题,并探讨了信任在研究系统中的作用,发现研究人员对政策制定者甚至其他研究人员的不信任与阿根廷的社会政治历史有着千丝万缕的联系,这有助于塑造研究人员与政策制定者相对立的身份认同。对于政策制定者、国家研究理事会和国家卫生研究系统的资助者而言,本文提供了对研究人员看法的更深入理解,这有助于在制定干预措施以提高研究利用率和制定公平合理的卫生政策时为项目设计提供参考并加以改进。对于对卫生研究能力建设和实现发展目标感兴趣的捐助者和发展机构而言,这项研究表明需要投资建设研究能力并培训卫生研究人员与公共政策“领域”进行互动,以及加强研究交流和向决策者的可转移性。它还凸显了投资实施研究平台的机会,例如卫生政策研究与分析机构。