White R J, Phillips D R
Biochemistry Department, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 25;28(15):6259-69. doi: 10.1021/bi00441a018.
An in vitro transcription assay has been developed to define the exact location of DNA binding ligands. The method employs two counterdirected Escherichia coli promoters separated by approximately 100 bp. Selective transcription from each promoter yields transcripts up to each ligand site. Nonsaturating levels of ligands result in fractional occupancy of ligand at each site, and hence a range of RNA transcript lengths. The bidirectional promoter system results in a transcription footprint which was derived from transcription from both promoters up to the 5' side of each occupied ligand site and defines the sequence specificity and binding site size of the DNA-bound ligand. The transcriptional footprint is precise to +/- 1 bp from the 5' and 3' ends of each binding site. Multiple ligand sites can be ranked in terms of relative fractional occupancy at each site, and the ranking is comparable from either transcription direction. The method was compared to classical DNase I footprinting with a series of DNA binding drugs [actinomycin D, echinomycin, bis(thiadaunomycin), mithramycin, nogalamycin, and an acridine-tripyrrole]. In all cases, specific binding sites were resolved more clearly by transcription footprinting than by DNase I footprinting. Because of the nature of the transcription assay, all occupied ligand sites were detected by this method, in contrast to DNase I footprinting where many sequences are not probed, and where ligand sites are often not accurately defined.
已开发出一种体外转录测定法来确定DNA结合配体的确切位置。该方法采用两个反向的大肠杆菌启动子,它们之间相隔约100个碱基对。从每个启动子的选择性转录产生直至每个配体位点的转录本。配体的非饱和水平导致每个位点配体的部分占据,因此产生一系列RNA转录本长度。双向启动子系统产生一个转录足迹,该足迹源自从两个启动子转录直至每个被占据配体位点的5'端,并定义了与DNA结合的配体的序列特异性和结合位点大小。转录足迹在每个结合位点的5'和3'端精确到+/- 1个碱基对。多个配体位点可以根据每个位点的相对部分占据率进行排序,并且从任一转录方向得到的排序都是可比的。将该方法与使用一系列DNA结合药物[放线菌素D、棘霉素、双(噻达霉素)、光神霉素、诺加霉素和一种吖啶-三吡咯]的经典DNase I足迹法进行了比较。在所有情况下,转录足迹法比DNase I足迹法更清楚地解析了特异性结合位点。由于转录测定的性质,该方法检测到了所有被占据的配体位点,这与DNase I足迹法不同,在DNase I足迹法中,许多序列未被探测,并且配体位点常常未被准确界定。