Suppr超能文献

一项关于老年人参与老年护理机构代际游戏小组益处的评估研究。

An evaluative study of the benefits of participating in intergenerational playgroups in aged care for older people.

作者信息

Skropeta C Margaret, Colvin Alf, Sladen Shannon

机构信息

School of Science and Health University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2014 Oct 8;14:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-109.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intergenerational playgroups in aged care are limited and little is known about the perceptions of individuals who have participated in such programs. Most research is focused on intergenerational programs that involved two generations of people--young people and older people or young people and people with dementia reported the significant outcomes for each group of participants. In this study a number of generations participated in the intergenerational playgroup intervention that included older people, child carers who were parents, grandparents or nannies and children aged 0-4 years old. The objective of this study was to explore the benefits of participating in an intergenerational playgroup program IPP in an aged care facility.

METHODS

This mixed methods quantitative and qualitative design explored the benefits of participating in an intergenerational playgroup program IPP in aged care settings. The intervention is an intergenerational playgroup program (IPP) offered in the aged care facility where intergenerational socialisation and interaction occurred between different generations. The SF36 and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) were used to collect pre-test post test data. The qualitative interpretive research approach used semi-structured interviews to develop the descriptive interpretation of the intergenerational playgroup experience. Interviews were conducted with aged care residents and child carers.

RESULTS

The pre-test post-test results for the SF36 revealed a declining trend in one scale only energy/fatigue and no significant differences on the Geriatric Depression Scale GDS. The interview analyses revealed the following themes (1) intergenerational experiences, (2) two-way contributions, (3) friendships work, (4) personal growth, and (5) environmental considerations and nineteen subthemes were extracted to provide meanings.

CONCLUSIONS

The IPP provided a successful innovative intergenerational program intervention where older people and people with dementia interacted and connected with a number of people from different generations. The IPP provided meaningful engagement for all participants considered important for self-esteem and the ability to participate fully in society. This allowed people to develop a sense of connectedness and friendships in a safe and secure environment. This increased the dignity of older people and people with dementia within the community and increased public awareness about the existing care and support services available to them.

摘要

背景

老年护理中的代际游戏小组数量有限,对于参与此类项目的个人的看法了解甚少。大多数研究集中在涉及两代人的代际项目——年轻人与老年人,或者年轻人与患有痴呆症的人,报告了每组参与者的显著成果。在本研究中,多代人参与了代际游戏小组干预,其中包括老年人、身为父母、祖父母或保姆的儿童照料者以及0至4岁的儿童。本研究的目的是探讨在老年护理机构中参与代际游戏小组项目(IPP)的益处。

方法

这种混合方法(定量和定性设计)探讨了在老年护理环境中参与代际游戏小组项目(IPP)的益处。该干预是在老年护理机构提供的代际游戏小组项目(IPP),不同代际之间发生了代际社交和互动。使用SF36和老年抑郁量表(GDS)收集测试前和测试后的数据。定性解释性研究方法使用半结构化访谈来对代际游戏小组经历进行描述性解释。对老年护理居民和儿童照料者进行了访谈。

结果

SF36的测试前和测试后结果显示,仅在一个量表(精力/疲劳)上呈下降趋势,在老年抑郁量表(GDS)上无显著差异。访谈分析揭示了以下主题:(1)代际经历,(2)双向贡献,(3)友谊作用,(4)个人成长,以及(5)环境因素,并提取了19个子主题以提供意义。

结论

IPP提供了一个成功的创新性代际项目干预,老年人和患有痴呆症的人与来自不同代际的许多人进行了互动和联系。IPP为所有参与者提供了有意义的参与,这对于自尊和充分参与社会的能力很重要。这使人们能够在安全可靠的环境中培养联系感和友谊。这提高了社区中老年人和患有痴呆症的人的尊严,并提高了公众对他们可获得的现有护理和支持服务的认识。

相似文献

2
An intergenerational playgroup in an Australian residential aged-care setting: A qualitative case study.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):488-497. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13149. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
Older residents' perceptions of family involvement in residential care.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1611298. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1611298.
9
Relational interactions preserving dignity experience: Perceptions of persons living with dementia.
Nurs Ethics. 2015 Aug;22(5):577-93. doi: 10.1177/0969733014549882. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Planning for Play? A Systematic Literature Review.
J Plan Lit. 2024 Feb;39(1):25-35. doi: 10.1177/08854122231169228. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
In the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Intergenerational Programs from the Perspectives of Their Different Stakeholders.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211916.
6
Cognitive Impairment in Grandparents: A Systematic Review.
Psychiatry Investig. 2021 Jul;18(7):593-602. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0034. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
8
Intergenerational programs: What can school-age children and older people expect from them? A systematic review.
Eur J Ageing. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):363-376. doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-00497-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
The role of day care in supporting older people living with long-term conditions.
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;12(4):510-515. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000391.
10
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Intergenerational Programs.
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 27;8:1882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01882. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

2
Doing as much as I can do: the meaning of activity for people with dementia.
Aging Ment Health. 2007 Jul;11(4):384-93. doi: 10.1080/13607860601086470.
4
Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: an observational assessment.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/153331750301800109.
7
Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey.
Age Ageing. 2001 Jul;30(4):337-43. doi: 10.1093/ageing/30.4.337.
8
"Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验