Dubé Timothy V, Schinke Robert J, Strasser Roger, Lightfoot Nancy
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury and Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Med Educ. 2014 Nov;48(11):1092-100. doi: 10.1111/medu.12532.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of a mobile research method, the guided walk, and its potential suitability in medical education research.
The Northern Ontario School of Medicine's (NOSM) longitudinal integrated clerkship served as the research context in which the guided walk method was used to explore the lived experiences of 12 Year 3 medical students undertaking their clerkship in one of eight different communities across Northern Ontario, Canada. Informed by the social constructivist research paradigm, the guided walk method was employed to answer the research question: how do Year 3 medical students at NOSM describe their clerkship experiences as encountered in their placement and living contexts? Through an inductive thematic analysis of the data, the findings provided a rich description of the guided walk from the participants' and the researcher's perspectives.
There were significant advantages to using the guided walk rather than other types of qualitative research approaches. The guided walk made it easier for participants to take part in the study, provided context-rich research interactions, and led to serendipitous encounters for both participants and the first author. There were also challenges and limitations associated with the guided walk method. For example, this method carries inherent challenges with reference to the safeguarding of confidentiality and anonymity for both participants and those encountered during the walk.
The guided walk method is promising within medical education, particularly for researchers seeking to gain participants' stories in the contexts to which they refer. This method may be appropriate for use in medical education research in areas such as the evaluation and assessment of a student's clinical decision-making skills and competency development, as well as the consolidation of strategies to manage ethical and professional dilemmas.
本文旨在对一种移动研究方法——引导式步行进行批判性分析,并探讨其在医学教育研究中的潜在适用性。
安大略省北部医学院(NOSM)的纵向综合实习作为研究背景,在此背景下运用引导式步行方法,探索12名三年级医学生在加拿大安大略省北部八个不同社区之一进行实习时的生活经历。基于社会建构主义研究范式,采用引导式步行方法来回答研究问题:NOSM的三年级医学生如何描述他们在实习地点和生活环境中所遇到的实习经历?通过对数据进行归纳主题分析,研究结果从参与者和研究者的角度对引导式步行进行了丰富的描述。
使用引导式步行比其他类型的定性研究方法有显著优势。引导式步行使参与者更容易参与研究,提供了丰富背景的研究互动,并为参与者和第一作者带来了意外的收获。引导式步行方法也存在挑战和局限性。例如,这种方法在保护参与者以及步行过程中遇到的人的保密性和匿名性方面存在内在挑战。
引导式步行方法在医学教育中前景广阔,尤其适用于那些试图在参与者所提及的背景中获取他们故事的研究者。这种方法可能适用于医学教育研究的某些领域,如评估学生的临床决策技能和能力发展,以及巩固处理伦理和专业困境的策略。